An empirical investigation of online review helpfulness: A big data perspective

被引:114
作者
Choi, Hoon S. [1 ]
Leon, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Comp Informat Syst, Walker Coll Business, 416 Howard St,2113 Peacock Hall, Boone, NC 28608 USA
[2] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Mkt Supply Chain Management, Walker Coll Business, 416 Howard St,4055 Peacock Hall, Boone, NC 28608 USA
关键词
Review helpfulness; eWOM; amazon.com; Big data; Review/source/context factors; WORD-OF-MOUTH; CONSUMER REVIEWS; USER REVIEWS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; PRODUCT VARIETY; HOTEL REVIEWS; EWOM; INFORMATION; SALES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2020.113403
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study investigates the determinants of online review helpfulness, adopting various predictors from three dimensions of the online review management: source factors, review factors, and context factors. Based on a large, comprehensive dataset that includes 14,051,211 online reviews in 24 product categories from an ecommerce retailer, Amazon.com, this study provides empirical evidence on the effect of source and reviews factors on perceived review helpfulness, which the extant literature has reached inconsistent conclusions. In addition, this study considers the effects on review helpfulness created by context factors: product satisfaction, product popularity, product intangibility, and product variety. These factors are scarcely discussed in the existing literature. The major findings include (1) review extremity, review depth, and reviewer expertise have a positive effect on review helpfulness; (2) review inconsistency, product intangibility, product satisfaction, product popularity, product variety, and reviewer experience have negative effects; and (3) product intangibility moderates the effect of review extremity and depth on review helpfulness.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Abd-Elaziz M E., 2015, International Journal of Heritage, Tourism, and Hospitality, V9
[2]   Online Review Helpfulness: Role of Qualitative Factors [J].
Agnihotri, Arpita ;
Bhattacharya, Saurabh .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2016, 33 (11) :1006-1017
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ICIS 2004 P
[4]  
Baccianella S, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5478, P461, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00958-7_41
[5]   Helpfulness of Online Consumer Reviews: Readers' Objectives and Review Cues [J].
Baek, Hyunmi ;
Ahn, JoongHo ;
Choi, Youngseok .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2012, 17 (02) :99-126
[6]   Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice [J].
Basinger, SJ ;
Lavine, H .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2005, 99 (02) :169-184
[7]   Comparison of Negative eWOM Intention: An Exploratory Study [J].
Boo, Soyoung ;
Kim, Jooho .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HOSPITALITY & TOURISM, 2013, 14 (01) :24-48
[8]   The Praise Paradox: When and Why Praise Backfires in Children With Low Self-Esteem [J].
Brummelman, Eddie ;
Crocker, Jennifer ;
Bushman, Brad J. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 10 (02) :111-115
[9]   Exploring determinants of voting for the "helpfulness" of online user reviews: A text mining approach [J].
Cao, Qing ;
Duan, Wenjing ;
Gan, Qiwei .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 50 (02) :511-521
[10]   Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations [J].
Cheung, Man Yee ;
Luo, Chuan ;
Sia, Choon Ling ;
Chen, Huaping .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2009, 13 (04) :9-38