共 36 条
Outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with cervical esophageal cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy
被引:14
作者:
Du, Xin-xin
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Yu, Rong
[1
]
Wang, Zhen-fei
[1
,5
]
Du, De-cheng
[1
]
Liu, Qiao-yun
[1
]
Wang, Run-mei
[1
]
Kang, Shi-rong
[6
]
Yang, Hao
[1
]
机构:
[1] Inner Mongolia Med Univ, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Inner Mongolia Canc Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Hohhot, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Cologne, Dept Obstet & Genecol, Res Grp Reprod Med, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, Dept Obstet & Genecol, IVF Lab, Cologne, Germany
[5] Inner Mongolia Med Univ, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Inner Mongolia Canc Hosp, Tumor Mol Diagnost Lab, Hohhot, Peoples R China
[6] Inner Mongolia Med Univ, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Hohhot, Peoples R China
关键词:
Cervical esophageal carcinoma;
radiotherapy;
chemoradiotherapy;
prognosis;
disease management;
survival;
3DCRT;
IMRT;
concurrent chemoradiotherapy;
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA;
FREE JEJUNAL GRAFT;
CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY;
CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY;
SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT;
RADIATION-THERAPY;
CHEMORADIATION;
RESECTION;
HEAD;
PATTERNS;
D O I:
10.17305/bjbms.2019.3873
中图分类号:
R-3 [医学研究方法];
R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) is uncommon, accounting for less than 5% of all esophageal cancers. The management of CEC is controversial. This study investigated treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of survival in CEC patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Ninety-one CEC patients were treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) between July 2007 and September 2017. The mean prescription dose was 64 Gy (range 54-70 Gy) delivered as 1.8-2.2 Gy per fraction per day, 5 days a week. Out of 91 patients, 34 received concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT) including 18 patients who also received neoadjuvant CT. Overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors of survival were determined in univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazard model) analysis. Treatment-related toxicity was also assessed. Median follow-up time for all patients was 19 months. Two-year OS, LRFFS and PFS of all patients were 58.2%, 52.5% and 48.1%, respectively. Clinical stage was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.03-5.37, p = 0.042), LRFFS (HR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.38-10.69, p = 0.011), and PFS (HR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.11-6.45, p = 0.028). Hoarseness was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.05-4.19, p = 0.036). CCRT was independently associated with better LRFFS (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.79, p = 0.012). 3DCRT and IMRT with concurrent CT is well-tolerated and may improve local tumor control in CEC patients. Advanced clinical stage and hoarseness are adverse prognostic factors for OS, LRFFS, and PFS in CEC.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 194
页数:9
相关论文