An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach for GIS-based multicriteria landslide susceptibility mapping

被引:116
作者
Feizizadeh, Bakhtiar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Blaschke, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Salzburg Univ, Dept Geoinformat Z GIS, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[2] Univ Tabriz, Ctr Remote Sensing, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Univ Tabriz, GIS, Tabriz, Iran
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
landslide susceptibility mapping; GIS-MCDA; Monte Carlo simulation; sensitivity analysis; Dempster-Shafer Theory; Urmia lake basin; DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY; URMIA LAKE BASIN; DECISION-ANALYSIS; HIERARCHY PROCESS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; SITE SELECTION; FUZZY-LOGIC; SUPPORT; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1080/13658816.2013.869821
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are increasingly being used in landslide susceptibility mapping. However, the uncertainties that are associated with MCDA techniques may significantly impact the results. This may sometimes lead to inaccurate outcomes and undesirable consequences. This article introduces a new GIS-based MCDA approach. We illustrate the consequences of applying different MCDA methods within a decision-making process through uncertainty analysis. Three GIS-MCDA methods in conjunction with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and Dempster-Shafer theory are analyzed for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) in the Urmia lake basin in Iran, which is highly susceptible to landslide hazards. The methodology comprises three stages. First, the LSM criteria are ranked and a sensitivity analysis is implemented to simulate error propagation based on the MCS. The resulting weights are expressed through probability density functions. Accordingly, within the second stage, three MCDA methods, namely analytical hierarchy process (AHP), weighted linear combination (WLC) and ordered weighted average (OWA), are used to produce the landslide susceptibility maps. In the third stage, accuracy assessments are carried out and the uncertainties of the different results are measured. We compare the accuracies of the three MCDA methods based on (1) the Dempster-Shafer theory and (2) a validation of the results using an inventory of known landslides and their respective coverage based on object-based image analysis of IRS-ID satellite images. The results of this study reveal that through the integration of GIS and MCDA models, it is possible to identify strategies for choosing an appropriate method for LSM. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the integration of MCDA and MCS can significantly improve the accuracy of the results. In LSM, the AHP method performed best, while the OWA reveals better performance in the reliability assessment. The WLC operation yielded poor results.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 638
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PROMETHEE II and fuzzy AHP: an enhanced GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping
    Roodposhti, Majid Shadman
    Rahimi, Saeed
    Beglou, Mansour Jafar
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2014, 73 (01) : 77 - 95
  • [32] Fuzzy Shannon Entropy: A Hybrid GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Method
    Roodposhti, Majid Shadman
    Aryal, Jagannath
    Shahabi, Himan
    Safarrad, Taher
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2016, 18 (10)
  • [33] GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for Land Use Planning and Risk Assessment
    Roccati, Anna
    Paliaga, Guido
    Luino, Fabio
    Faccini, Francesco
    Turconi, Laura
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (02) : 1 - 28
  • [34] Application of GIS-based statistical modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping in the city of Azazga, Northern Algeria
    Bourenane, Hamid
    Meziani, Aghiles Abdelghani
    Benamar, Dalila Ait
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 80 (10) : 7333 - 7359
  • [35] Uncertainty due to DEM error in landslide susceptibility mapping
    Qin, Cheng-Zhi
    Bao, Li-Li
    Zhu, A-Xing
    Wang, Rong-Xun
    Hu, Xue-Mei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2013, 27 (07) : 1364 - 1380
  • [36] An expert knowledge-based approach to landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and fuzzy logic
    Zhu, A-Xing
    Wang, Rongxun
    Qiao, Jianping
    Qin, Cheng-Zhi
    Chen, Yongbo
    Liu, Jing
    Du, Fei
    Lin, Yang
    Zhu, Tongxin
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2014, 214 : 128 - 138
  • [37] GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using bivariate statistical analysis in Devrek (Zonguldak-Turkey)
    Cagatay Yilmaz
    Tamer Topal
    Mehmet Lütfi Süzen
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012, 65 : 2161 - 2178
  • [38] GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using bivariate statistical analysis in Devrek (Zonguldak-Turkey)
    Yilmaz, Cagatay
    Topal, Tamer
    Suzen, Mehmet Lutfi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2012, 65 (07) : 2161 - 2178
  • [39] GIS-BASED LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
    Sharma, Ankur
    Sandhu, Har Amrit Singh
    [J]. IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 3038 - 3041
  • [40] Comparing GIS-based support vector machine kernel functions for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Bakhtiar Feizizadeh
    Majid Shadman Roodposhti
    Thomas Blaschke
    Jagannath Aryal
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 10