Inter-row vision guidance for mechanical weed control in sugar beet

被引:89
|
作者
Tillett, ND [1 ]
Hague, T [1 ]
Miles, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Silsoe Res Inst, Silsoe MK45 4HS, Beds, England
关键词
mechanical weed control; vision guidance; inter-row guidance;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00005-4
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Despite a general move over the last 20 years towards low volume overall spraying techniques, mechanical weeding using inter-row hoes is still practised by a significant number of UK sugar beet growers. Reasons for this include the control of difficult weeds e.g. volunteer potatoes, thistles and larger weeds surviving herbicide application, as well as the control of weed beet. However, for general weed control, savings in herbicide cost have to be balanced against a relatively low hoeing work rate. Increased use of inter-row hoeing to achieve the potential economic and environmental benefits, can only be accomplished by the introduction of high workrate equipment. This paper describes research, building on earlier work conducted in cereals, which addresses the problems of automatically guiding hoes between rows of sugar beet at high speed. Results indicate that the previously used combination of Kalman filter row tracking and bandpass filter row location provide a sound basis for following rows of larger sugar beet plants. Smaller plants could also be followed if the single pixel scan lines used by the bandpass filter algorithm were replaced by bands formed by merging columns of pixels to increase the information content. The hoe was evaluated at 6 kph under a variety crop conditions ranging from two true leaves with a population of 1700/m(2) newly germinated weeds, through to a relatively clean crop in which crop plants had just started to touch in-the-row. Lighting conditions included diffuse sky and direct sun illumination in which the tractor and hoe cast shadows in the image region. Under this range of conditions standard deviation in hoe lateral error relative to crop rows remained within 16 mm and mean bias never exceeded +/- 10 mm. Additional tests to evaluate the hoe's ability to cross gaps in which all four of the crop rows used for guidance had been removed showed that error did not become unacceptable until gap length exceeded 4 in. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 177
页数:15
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Inter-row hoeing for weed control in organic spring cereals-Influence of inter-row spacing and nitrogen rate
    Melander, Bo
    Jabran, Khawar
    De Notaris, Chiara
    Znova, Liubava
    Green, Ole
    Olesen, Jurgen E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2018, 101 : 49 - 56
  • [2] Studies on mechanical weed control in sugar beet
    Haberland, R
    Schmidt, E
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2004, : 537 - 544
  • [3] A vision based row detection system for sugar beet
    Bakker, Tijmen
    Wouters, Hendrik
    van Asselt, Kees
    Bontsema, Jan
    Tang, Lie
    Mueller, Joachim
    van Straten, Gerrit
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2008, 60 (01) : 87 - 95
  • [4] Agronomic evaluation of precise mechanical hoeing and chemical weed control in sugar beet
    Wiltshire, JJJ
    Tillett, ND
    Hague, T
    WEED RESEARCH, 2003, 43 (04) : 236 - 244
  • [5] Effects of inter-row hoeing and fertilizer placement on weed growth and yield of winter wheat
    Melander, B
    Cirujeda, A
    Jorgensen, MH
    WEED RESEARCH, 2003, 43 (06) : 428 - 438
  • [6] Weed harrowing and inter-row hoeing in organic grown quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Jacobsen, Sven-Erik
    Christiansen, Jorgen L.
    Rasmussen, Jesper
    OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2010, 39 (03) : 223 - 227
  • [7] Benefits of Precision Farming Technologies for Mechanical Weed Control in Soybean and Sugar Beet-Comparison of Precision Hoeing with Conventional Mechanical Weed Control
    Kunz, Christoph
    Weber, Jonas Felix
    Gerhards, Roland
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2015, 5 (02): : 130 - 142
  • [8] Development of a commercial vision guided inter-row hoe: achievements, problems and future directions
    Tillett, N
    Hague, T
    Garford, P
    Watts, P
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2003, : 671 - 676
  • [9] Comparison of mechanical and chemical weed control in sugar beet - Impact on pest insects and epigaeic predatory arthropods
    Weller, Jessica
    Lehmhus, Joern
    SUGAR INDUSTRY-ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, 2022, 147 (04): : 202 - 206
  • [10] The finger weeder cultivator for intra-row mechanical weed control: Effects of uprooting force on selected weed species
    Asaf, Evyatar
    Shulner, Itai
    Bakshian, Hila
    Kapiluto, Omer
    Eizenberg, Hanan
    Lati, Ran Nisim
    WEED RESEARCH, 2024, 64 (04) : 321 - 332