Analytical validation of the Oncotype DX prostate cancer assay - a clinical RT-PCR assay optimized for prostate needle biopsies

被引:246
作者
Knezevic, Dejan [1 ]
Goddard, Audrey D. [1 ]
Natraj, Nisha [1 ]
Cherbavaz, Diana B. [1 ]
Clark-Langone, Kim M. [1 ]
Snable, Jay [1 ]
Watson, Drew [1 ]
Falzarano, Sara M. [2 ]
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina [2 ,3 ]
Klein, Eric A. [3 ]
Quale, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Genom Hlth Inc, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Robert Tomsich Pathol & Lab Med Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
BMC GENOMICS | 2013年 / 14卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; Quantitative RT-PCR; Needle biopsy; Prognostic biomarkers; Analytical validation; GENE-EXPRESSION; RECURRENCE RISK; PREDICTION; CARCINOMA; TAMOXIFEN; SOCIETY; SCORE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-14-690
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: The Oncotype DX (R) Prostate Cancer Assay is a multi-gene RT-PCR expression assay that was developed for use with fixed paraffin-embedded (FPE) diagnostic prostate needle biopsies containing as little as 1 mm of prostate tumor in the greatest dimension. The assay measures expression of 12 cancer-related genes representing four biological pathways and 5 reference genes which are algorithmically combined to calculate the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS). This biopsy-based assay has been analytically and subsequently clinically validated as a predictor of aggressive prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to validate the analytical performance of the Oncotype DX Prostate Cancer Assay using predefined acceptance criteria. Results: The lowest quartile of RNA yields from prostate needle biopsies (six 5 mu m sections) was between 19 and 34 ng. Analytical validation of the process requiring as little as 5 ng of RNA met all pre-defined acceptance criteria. Amplification efficiencies, analytical sensitivity, and accuracy of gene assays were measured by serially diluting an RNA sample and analyzing features of the linear regression between RNA expression measured by the crossing point (Cp) versus the log(2) of the RNA input per PCR assay well. Gene assays were shown to accurately measure expression over a wide range of inputs (from as low as 0.005 ng to 320 ng). Analytical accuracy was excellent with average biases at qPCR inputs representative of patient samples <9.7% across all assays while amplification efficiencies were within +/-6% of the median. Assessments of reproducibility and precision were performed by testing 10 prostate cancer RNA samples over multiple instruments, reagent lots, operators, days (precision), and RNA input levels (reproducibility) using appropriately parameterized linear mixed models. The standard deviations for analytical precision and reproducibility were 1.86 and 2.11 GPS units (100-unit scale) respectively. Conclusions: The Oncotype DX Prostate Cancer Assay, a clinical RT-PCR assay specifically designed for use with prostate needle biopsies, has been analytically validated using very limited RNA inputs. The assay requirements and analytical performance will provide physicians with test results from a robust and reliable assay which will enable improved treatment decisions for men diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial
    Albain, Kathy S.
    Barlow, William E.
    Shak, Steven
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    Livingston, Robert B.
    Yeh, I-Tien
    Ravdin, Peter
    Bugarini, Roberto
    Boehner, Frederick L.
    Davidson, Nancy E.
    Sledge, George W.
    Winer, Eric P.
    Hudis, Clifford
    Ingle, James N.
    Perez, Edith A.
    Pritchard, Kathleen I.
    Shepherd, Lois
    Gralow, Julie R.
    Yoshizawa, Carl
    Allred, D. Craig
    Osborne, C. Kent
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL
  • [3] Translating tumor biology into personalized treatment planning: analytical performance characteristics of the Oncotype DX® Colon Cancer Assay
    Clark-Langone, Kim M.
    Sangli, Chithra
    Krishnakumar, Jayadevi
    Watson, Drew
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2010, 10
  • [4] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE BIOPSY-BASED GENOMIC PROSTATE SCORE (GPS) AS A PREDICTOR OF HIGH GRADE OR EXTRACAPSULAR PROSTATE CANCER TO IMPROVE PATIENT SELECTION FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    Simko, Jeffry
    Falzarano, Sara
    Maddala, Tara
    Chan, June
    Cowan, Janet
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Tsiatis, Athanasios
    Tenggara-Hunter, Imelda
    Knezevic, Dejan
    Baehner, Frederick
    Kattan, Michael
    Shak, Steven
    Lee, Mark
    Klein, Eric
    Carroll, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04) : E873 - E873
  • [5] Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Progress and Promise
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (27) : 3669 - 3676
  • [6] Time Trends and Local Variation in Primary Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Broering, Jeanette M.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (07) : 1117 - 1123
  • [7] Analytical validation of the oncotype DX genomic diagnostic test for recurrence prognosis and therapeutic response prediction in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Cronin, Maureen
    Sangli, Chithra
    Liu, Mei-Lan
    Pho, Mylan
    Dutta, Debjani
    Nguyen, Anhthu
    Jeong, Jennie
    Wu, Jenny
    Langone, Kim Clark
    Watson, Drew
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 53 (06) : 1084 - 1091
  • [8] Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence Using the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Node-Negative and Node-Positive Postmenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Anastrozole or Tamoxifen: A TransATAC Study
    Dowsett, Mitch
    Cuzick, Jack
    Wale, Christopher
    Forbes, John
    Mallon, Elizabeth A.
    Salter, Janine
    Quinn, Emma
    Dunbier, Anita
    Baum, Michael
    Buzdar, Aman
    Howell, Anthony
    Bugarini, Roberto
    Baehner, Frederick L.
    Shak, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (11) : 1829 - 1834
  • [9] The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
    Epstein, JI
    Allsbrook, WC
    Amin, MB
    Egevad, LL
    Bastacky, S
    Beltrán, AL
    Berner, A
    Billis, A
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Cheng, L
    Civantos, F
    Cohen, C
    Cohen, MB
    Datta, M
    Davis, C
    Delahunt, B
    Delprado, W
    Eble, JN
    Foster, CS
    Furusato, M
    Gaudin, PB
    Grignon, DJ
    Humphrey, PA
    Iczkowski, KA
    Jones, EC
    Lucia, S
    McCue, PA
    Nazeer, T
    Oliva, E
    Pan, CC
    Pizov, G
    Reuter, V
    Samaratunga, H
    Sebo, T
    Sesterhenn, I
    Shevchuk, M
    Srigley, JR
    Suzigan, S
    Takahashi, H
    Tamboli, P
    Tan, PH
    Têtu, B
    Tickoo, S
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Troncoso, P
    Tsuzuki, T
    True, LD
    van der Kwast, T
    Wheeler, TM
    Wojno, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) : 1228 - 1242
  • [10] Validation Study of a Quantitative Multigene Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Assessment of Recurrence Risk in Patients With Stage II Colon Cancer
    Gray, Richard G.
    Quirke, Philip
    Handley, Kelly
    Lopatin, Margarita
    Magill, Laura
    Baehner, Frederick L.
    Beaumont, Claire
    Clark-Langone, Kim M.
    Yoshizawa, Carl N.
    Lee, Mark
    Watson, Drew
    Shak, Steven
    Kerr, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (35) : 4611 - 4619