Is smart city resilient? Evidence from China

被引:144
|
作者
Zhu, Shiyao [1 ]
Li, Dezhi [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Haibo [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Engn Res Ctr Bldg Equipment Energy & Environm, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, 1137 Alumni Ave, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Urban resilience; Smart city; AHP-TOPSIS method; Infrastructure; Regression analysis; DISASTER RESILIENCE; URBAN RESILIENCE; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; NATURAL DISASTERS; CITIES; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; CONTEXT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Smart city is originally aimed at dealing with various urban problems due to rapid urbanization, like energy shortage, congestion, and environmental pollution. The Chinese government has been devoting to the promotion of smart cities for many years. However, it is unconfirmed whether the city is more resilient with all the modern technologies provided when unexpected predicaments like climate changes or disasters occur. Therefore, it is urgent to consider resilience in the smart city. This paper provides a MCDM approach to assess and rank the resilience of 187 smart cities in China. The results demonstrate that the overall resilience of smart cities is at a relatively low level. There is also a significant unbalance of resilience between smart cities due to different infrastructural, economic, social, institutional, and environmental conditions. The potential links between urban smartness and resilience were also explored, and the results showed significant positive relationship between the smartness of a city and its resilience. Evidence also proved that developing smartness is more or less useful for improving urban resilience. Suggestions such as strengthening the development of infrastructure and economy, and enhancing the multi-stakeholders' cooperation are proposed to further promote the smart and resilient development in China.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does smart city construction affect urban renewal? Evidence from China
    Li, Bowen
    Hu, Ruyue
    Yang, Jinru
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2025, 496
  • [32] Economic Impact of Smart City Investment: Evidence from the Smart Columbus Projects
    Chen, Zhenhua
    Cheng, Junmei
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2022, : 1881 - 1897
  • [33] Multi-criteria decision-making models for smart city ranking: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta region, China
    Ye, Fei
    Chen, Yingying
    Li, Lixu
    Li, Yina
    Yin, Ying
    CITIES, 2022, 128
  • [34] The impact of Smart city construction on labour spatial allocation: Evidence from China
    Ai, Hongshan
    Zhou, Zhengqing
    Yan, Ying
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 56 (19) : 2337 - 2356
  • [35] An integrated framework for assessment of smart city resilience
    Khatibi, Hamed
    Wilkinson, Suzanne
    Eriwata, Graham
    Sweya, Lukuba N.
    Baghersad, Mostafa
    Dianat, Heiman
    Ghaedi, Khaled
    Javanmardi, Ahad
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE, 2022, 49 (05) : 1556 - 1577
  • [36] An Overview of Smart City in China
    Guo, Minjie
    Liu, Yiheng
    Yu, Haibin
    Hu, Binyu
    Sang, Ziqin
    CHINA COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 13 (05) : 203 - 211
  • [37] A holistic evaluation of smart city performance in the context of China
    Shen, Liyin
    Huang, Zhenhua
    Wong, Siu Wai
    Liao, Shiju
    Lou, Yingli
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 200 : 667 - 679
  • [38] The Governance Approach of Smart City Initiatives. Evidence from Trondheim, Bergen, and Bodo
    Gohari, Savis
    Ahlers, Dirk
    Nielsen, Brita F.
    Junker, Eivind
    INFRASTRUCTURES, 2020, 5 (04)
  • [39] Does smart city implementation improve the subjective quality of life? Evidence from China
    Wang, Mengmeng
    Zhou, Tao
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2023, 72
  • [40] Smart city projects against COVID-19: Quantitative evidence from China
    Yang, ShanShan
    Chong, Zhaohui
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 70