Is smart city resilient? Evidence from China

被引:157
作者
Zhu, Shiyao [1 ]
Li, Dezhi [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Haibo [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Engn Res Ctr Bldg Equipment Energy & Environm, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, 1137 Alumni Ave, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Urban resilience; Smart city; AHP-TOPSIS method; Infrastructure; Regression analysis; DISASTER RESILIENCE; URBAN RESILIENCE; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; NATURAL DISASTERS; CITIES; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; CONTEXT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Smart city is originally aimed at dealing with various urban problems due to rapid urbanization, like energy shortage, congestion, and environmental pollution. The Chinese government has been devoting to the promotion of smart cities for many years. However, it is unconfirmed whether the city is more resilient with all the modern technologies provided when unexpected predicaments like climate changes or disasters occur. Therefore, it is urgent to consider resilience in the smart city. This paper provides a MCDM approach to assess and rank the resilience of 187 smart cities in China. The results demonstrate that the overall resilience of smart cities is at a relatively low level. There is also a significant unbalance of resilience between smart cities due to different infrastructural, economic, social, institutional, and environmental conditions. The potential links between urban smartness and resilience were also explored, and the results showed significant positive relationship between the smartness of a city and its resilience. Evidence also proved that developing smartness is more or less useful for improving urban resilience. Suggestions such as strengthening the development of infrastructure and economy, and enhancing the multi-stakeholders' cooperation are proposed to further promote the smart and resilient development in China.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[51]   A critical review of social resilience assessment frameworks in disaster management [J].
Saja, A. M. Aslam ;
Goonetilleke, Ashantha ;
Teo, Melissa ;
Ziyath, Abdul M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2019, 35
[52]  
González DS, 2016, CUAD GEOGR, V55, P85
[53]   A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience [J].
Sharifi, Ayyoob .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 69 :629-647
[54]   A holistic evaluation of smart city performance in the context of China [J].
Shen, Liyin ;
Huang, Zhenhua ;
Wong, Siu Wai ;
Liao, Shiju ;
Lou, Yingli .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 200 :667-679
[55]  
The State Council of the PRC, 2014, NAT NEW URB PLANN
[56]  
United Nations D. E. S. A., 2014, DAT BAS
[57]   Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications [J].
Vaidya, OS ;
Kumar, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 169 (01) :1-29
[58]   Identifying characteristics of resilient urban communities through a case study method [J].
Wang, Yun-cai ;
Shen, Jia-ke ;
Xiang, Wei-ning ;
Wang, Jie-Qiong .
JOURNAL OF URBAN MANAGEMENT, 2018, 7 (03) :141-151
[59]   Smart city with Chinese characteristics against the background of big data: Idea, action and risk [J].
Wu, Yuzhe ;
Zhang, Weiwen ;
Shen, Jiahui ;
Mo, Zhibin ;
Peng, Yi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 173 :60-66
[60]  
XIE Q, 2017, SCI DECISION MAKING, V6, P60, DOI DOI 10.3773/J.ISSN.1006-4885.2017.04.060