Comparison of Whole-Body PET/CT, Dedicated High-Resolution Head and Neck PET/CT, and Contrast-Enhanced CT in Preoperative Staging of Clinically M0 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

被引:77
作者
Rodrigues, Rosana S. [2 ,3 ]
Bozza, Fernando A. [4 ,5 ]
Christian, Paul E. [6 ]
Hoffman, John M. [1 ]
Butterfield, Regan I. [6 ]
Christensen, Carl R. [1 ]
Heilbrun, Marta [1 ]
Wiggins, Richard H., III [1 ]
Hunt, Jason P. [7 ]
Bentz, Brandon G. [7 ]
Hitchcock, Ying J. [8 ]
Morton, Kathryn A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Radiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Biomaging INBEB, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Dept Radiol, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Natl Inst Sci & Technol Struct Biol, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[6] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[7] Univ Utah, Dept Surg, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[8] Univ Utah, Dept Radiat Oncol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
关键词
positron emission tomography; computed tomography; head and neck cancer; squamous cell carcinoma; tumor staging; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; FDG-PET/CT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; IMAGING MODALITIES; F-18-FDG PET; ORAL-CAVITY; CANCER; IMPACT; TUMORS;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.109.062075
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare optimized whole-body (WB) and dedicated high-resolution contrast-enhanced PET/CT protocols and contrast enhanced CT in the preoperative staging of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Methods: A total of 44 patients with clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck underwent primary tumor resection and neck dissection within 6 wk of diagnostic imaging. Imaging consisted of a standard WB PET/CT protocol without intravenous contrast enhancement, followed by a high-resolution dedicated head and neck (HN) PET/CT protocol, which included diagnostic-quality contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Imaging results were compared with histopathology. A 5-point scale was used to designate primary tumor localization and the presence of lymph node metastasis on a per-patient and per-level basis. For cervical nodes, receiver-operating-characteristic curves were generated to determine the differences in performance between the WB and HN PET/CT protocols and CECT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated for primary tumor and cervical nodes. Results: No statistical difference was observed between WB and HN PET/CT protocols, both of which significantly outperformed CECT, in the evaluation of the primary tumor. The performance of the HN PET/CT protocol was superior to that of the WB PET/CT in the detection of cervical node metastases, achieving statistical significance on a per-level basis and approaching significance on a per-patient basis, with the greatest advantage in the detection of small positive lymph nodes (<15 mm). No significant difference was observed between the WB PET/CT protocol and CECT in nodal staging, either on a per-patient or on a per-level basis. Conclusion: The primary advantage of the dedicated HN PET/CT protocol over the WB protocol or CECT in the staging of head and neck cancer is in the detection of small lymph node metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1213
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Metastatic head and neck cancer: Role and usefulness of FDG PET in locating occult primary tumors [J].
Aassar, OS ;
Fischbein, NJ ;
Caputo, GR ;
Kaplan, MJ ;
Price, DC ;
Singer, MI ;
Dillon, WP ;
Hawkins, RA .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (01) :177-181
[2]   Indications for PET/CT in the head and neck [J].
Agarwal, Vikas ;
Branstetter, Barton F. ;
Johnson, Jonas T. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 41 (01) :23-+
[3]   Head and neck malignancy: Is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? [J].
Branstetter, BF ;
Blodgett, TM ;
Zimmer, LA ;
Snyderman, CH ;
Johnson, JT ;
Raman, S ;
Meltzer, CC .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) :580-586
[4]   Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging [J].
de Bondt, R. B. J. ;
Nelemans, P. J. ;
Hofman, P. A. M. ;
Casselman, J. W. ;
Kremer, B. ;
van Engelshoven, J. M. A. ;
Beets-Tan, R. G. H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 64 (02) :266-272
[5]   Diagnosis and staging of head and neck cancer - A comparison of modern imaging modalities (positron emission tomography, computed tomography, color-coded duplex sonography) with panendoscopic and histopathologic findings [J].
Di Martino, E ;
Nowak, B ;
Hassan, HA ;
Hausmann, R ;
Adam, G ;
Buell, U ;
Westhofen, M .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2000, 126 (12) :1457-1461
[6]   Clinical impact of positron emission tomography (PET) with (18F)fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in head and neck tumours [J].
Ekberg, Tomas ;
Sorensen, Jens ;
Engstrom, Mats ;
Blomquist, Erik ;
Sundin, Anders ;
Anniko, Matti .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2007, 127 (02) :186-193
[7]   Impact of [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography on previously untreated head and neck cancer patients [J].
Fleming, Alfred J., Jr. ;
Smith, Stephen P., Jr. ;
Paul, Christopher M. ;
Hall, Nathan C. ;
Daly, Brett T. ;
Agrawal, Amit ;
Schuller, David E. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2007, 117 (07) :1173-1179
[8]   Impact of whole body positron emission tomography on initial staging and therapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity [J].
Goerres, GW ;
Schmid, DT ;
Grätz, KW ;
von Schulthess, GK ;
Eyrich, GK .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 39 (06) :547-551
[9]   Positron emission tomography in the early follow-up of advanced head and neck cancer [J].
Goerres, GW ;
Schmid, DT ;
Bandhauer, F ;
Huguenin, PU ;
von Schulthess, GK ;
Schmid, S ;
Stoeckli, SJ .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2004, 130 (01) :105-109
[10]   Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in patients with carcinoma of the larynx: Diagnostic accuracy and impact on clinical management [J].
Gordin, A ;
Daitzchman, M ;
Doweck, I ;
Yefremov, N ;
Golz, A ;
Keidar, Z ;
Bar-Shalom, R ;
Kuten, A ;
Israel, O .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2006, 116 (02) :273-278