Factors Influencing Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students at Russian Universities

被引:40
作者
Maloshonok, Natalia [1 ]
Shmeleva, Evgeniia [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Ctr Sociol Higher Educ, Inst Educ, Moscow, Russia
关键词
Academic dishonesty; Theory of planned behaviour; Undergraduate students; Russian universities; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCES; PERCEPTIONS; PREVALENCE; BUSINESS; CODES; MODEL; PERSONALITY; INTENTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10805-019-9324-y
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Student academic dishonesty is a pervasive problem for universities all over the world. The development of innovative practices and interventions for decreasing dishonest behaviour requires understanding factors influencing academic dishonesty. Previous research showed that personal, environmental, and situational factors affect dishonest behaviour at a university. The set of factors and the strength of their influence can differ across countries. There is a lack of research on factors affecting student dishonesty in Russia. A sample of 15,159 undergraduate students from eight Russian highly selective universities was surveyed to understand what factors influence their decision to engage in dishonest behaviour. Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) was employed to explain dishonest behaviour among students. The explained variance in the engagement in academic dishonesty equals 48% in the model for the full sample, and reaches 69% in the model for one of the considered institutions. The major findings of this study were: (1) subjective norms appeared to dominate as the strongest predictor of academic dishonesty across the Russian universities; (2) perceived behavioural control, appeared to be positively related to the dishonest behaviour. In the majority of universities, this factor was found to be insignificant. This finding indicates a specific feature of Russian students' an ethical decision-making process discussed in the last part of the paper.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 329
页数:17
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [21] Denisova-Schmidt E., 2016, European Journal of Higher Education, V6, P128, DOI DOI 10.1080/21568235.2016.1154477
  • [22] Denisova-Schmidt E, 2016, CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC APPROACH, P105
  • [23] DENISOVASCHMIDT.E, 2017, CIHE PERSPECTIVES, V5
  • [24] The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?
    Eisinga, Rob
    te Grotenhuis, Manfred
    Pelzer, Ben
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 58 (04) : 637 - 642
  • [25] Freiburger TL, 2017, J CRIM JUSTICE EDUC, V28, P222, DOI 10.1080/10511253.2016.1203010
  • [26] Friedman Adi, 2016, Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects, V12, P193
  • [27] Froumin I., 2017, Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions
  • [28] Big Five personality and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic review
    Giluk, Tamara L.
    Postlethwaite, Bennett E.
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 72 : 59 - 67
  • [29] Golunov S., 2014, The Elephant in the Room: Corruption and Cheating in Russian Universities, V132
  • [30] Golunov S, 2013, CEURUS EU RUSSIA PAP, V9