Overtreatment in adults with epilepsy

被引:39
作者
Deckers, CLP
机构
[1] Dutch Epilepsy Clin Fdn, SEIN, NL-8025 BV Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Nijmegen Epilepsy Res Grp, NL-6526 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
treatment; adults; drug load; combination therapy; adverse effects;
D O I
10.1016/S0920-1211(02)00184-5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Overtreatment of epilepsy patients is traditionally associated with the use of polytherapy, i.e. use of more than one antiepileptic drug (AED). Although monotherapy is now being used in 70% of patients with epilepsy, these patients are also at risk at being overtreated. Ten to 20% of patients withdraw from their first drug because of adverse effects. This is partly related to high starting dosages and fast titration rates. The conventional AEDs are still first choice monotherapy drugs, although they potentially have more adverse effects, especially in the elderly. Other problems are the random selection of second or third choice drugs and the uncertainty about when to switch to polytherapy. Several authors have suggested that patients with progressive forms of epilepsy, such as patients with mesiotemporal sclerosis, should be treated adequately as soon as possible and that epilepsy surgery should be considered for them in a much earlier stage. Overtreatment in polytherapy is still a large threat, due to several reasons: drug loads are much higher, and thus more adverse effects are likely to develop; drug combinations are selected randomly, as evidence about effective combinations has been scarce; the constant choice between continuing the existing treatment (which is suboptimal) and trying new drugs (which may disturb a patient's equilibrium); the long-term use of benzodiazepines. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 52
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] REDUCTION OF POLYPHARMACY IN EPILEPTIC PATIENTS
    ALBRIGHT, P
    BRUNI, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1985, 42 (08) : 797 - 799
  • [2] Is refractory epilepsy preventable?
    Arroyo, S
    Brodie, MJ
    Avanzini, G
    Baumgartner, C
    Chiron, C
    Dulac, O
    French, JA
    Serratosa, JM
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2002, 43 (04) : 437 - 444
  • [3] Barcs G, 2000, EPILEPSIA, V41, P1597
  • [4] QUALITY OF CARE OF EPILEPSY IN ITALY - A MULTI-HOSPITAL SURVEY OF DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF 1104 EPILEPTIC PATIENTS
    BEGHI, E
    SASANELLI, F
    SPAGNOLI, A
    TOGNONI, G
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 1982, 23 (02) : 133 - 148
  • [5] ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS AS TRACERS OF DISEASE - A CALCULATION OF THE PREVALENCE OF EPILEPSY THROUGH AN ANALYSIS OF DRUG CONSUMPTION
    BEGHI, E
    MONTICELLI, ML
    MONZA, G
    SESSA, A
    ZARRELLI, M
    [J]. NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 10 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [6] BEGHI E, 1992, EPILEPSIA, V33, P45
  • [7] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF LAMOTRIGINE AND CARBAMAZEPINE IN NEWLY-DIAGNOSED EPILEPSY
    BRODIE, MJ
    RICHENS, A
    YUEN, AWC
    [J]. LANCET, 1995, 345 (8948): : 476 - 479
  • [8] Multicentre, double-blind, randomised comparison between lamotrigine and carbamazepine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy
    Brodie, MJ
    Overstall, PW
    Giorgi, L
    [J]. EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 1999, 37 (01) : 81 - 87
  • [9] Levetiracetam for partial seizures - Results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Cereghino, JJ
    Biton, V
    Abou-Khalil, B
    Dreifuss, F
    Gauer, LJ
    Leppik, I
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2000, 55 (02) : 236 - 242
  • [10] Managing epilepsy in general practice: The dissemination and uptake of a free audit package, and collated results from 12 practices in England and Wales
    Chappell, B
    Hall, WW
    [J]. SEIZURE, 1997, 6 (01) : 9 - 12