Labouring geography: Negotiating scales, strategies and future directions

In our editorial introduction to this themed issue on tabour geography, we outline some important ongoing debates in the relatively young field of tabour geography and suggest future directions for research. First, there is the key question of labour as an active agent in the production of economic landscapes. The agency of labour will likely remain a defining feature of tabour geography, but perhaps it is not as important to construct theoretical analytical boundaries as it is to define tabour geography as a political project. Second, debates continue surrounding the production of scale and the multiscalarity of organized labour. Third, tabour geographers have yet to engage in any sustained fashion with unpacking the complex identities of workers and the way in which those identities simultaneously are shaped by and shape the economic and cultural landscape. Fourth, there is some debate on the costs and benefits of a 'normative' labour geography which emphasizes what workers and their organizations 'could' or even 'should' do. Lastly, we challenge the assumption that labour geographers have not yet asserted themselves as activists in their own right. We conclude the editorial by introducing the articles included in the issue. While these articles may not address every gap in the literature, they do contribute in significant ways to move the labour geography project forward. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.