Assessing value in platformed product family design

被引:97
作者
Gonzalez-Zugasti, JP
Otto, KN
Baker, JD
机构
[1] MIT, Ctr Innovat Prod Dev, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Architecture Div, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
来源
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND CONCURRENT ENGINEERING | 2001年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
platforms; options; value;
D O I
10.1007/s001630100001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A platform is the set of elements and interfaces that are common to a family of products. In this paper, the design of a platform-based product family is formulated as an optimization problem. This optimization is then transformed into a two-step process amenable to industrial product design processes. The first step involves designing the technical aspects of the product family, optimizing an objective (or a set of objectives) subject to technical constraints, with external uncertain factors fixed. We have previously presented such a method for designing product families based on platforms that optimizes performance and cost metrics, using variables and a system model. That approach allows a team of engineers to design and evaluate candidate platforms, given perfect understanding of the designs and requirements. The second step is to quantify the value to the firm for each identified design alternative, while here accounting for external uncertain factors of the product family development. In this paper we present a model to perform this second step of the overall approach. Real options concepts are introduced to model the risks and delayed decision benefits present during product development due to uncertainty in technologies, funding, etc. We develop a quantitative measure of the value to the company for different family designs, and apply it to select the most appropriate design from the possible alternatives. An application to the design of platform-based families of spacecraft is shown.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 41
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] FUZZY COMPROMISE - AN EFFECTIVE WAY TO SOLVE HIERARCHICAL DESIGN-PROBLEMS
    ALLEN, JK
    KRISHNAMACHARI, RS
    MASETTA, J
    PEARCE, D
    RIGBY, D
    MISTREE, F
    [J]. STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1992, 4 (02): : 115 - 120
  • [2] [Anonymous], MODEL BASED APPROACH
  • [3] ANTONSSON E, 1995, J MECH DESIGN J VIBR, V117, P11
  • [4] BLACK F, 1973, J POLITICAL EC MAY
  • [5] BREALY R, 1991, PRINCIPLEES FINANCE
  • [6] Bremmer R., 1999, Financial Times Automotive World, P30
  • [7] A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors
    Chen, W
    ALlen, JK
    Tsui, KL
    Mistree, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1996, 118 (04) : 478 - 485
  • [8] Cohen I.L., 1995, QUALITY FUNCTION DEP
  • [9] Dixit K., 1994, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN
  • [10] Applying 'options thinking' to R&D valuation
    Faulkner, TW
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1996, 39 (03) : 50 - 56