Distraction osteogenesis of the hypoplastic midface using a rigid external distraction system: The results of a one- to six-year follow-up

被引:51
作者
Cho, Byung Chae
Kyung, Hee Mun
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Sch Med, Inst Cell & Matrix Biol, Taegu 700721, South Korea
[2] Kyungpook Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Orthodont, Taegu 700721, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.prs.0000243563.43421.0b
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term stability of maxillary distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device, based on a 7-year experience. Methods: Nine patients with severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia were treated between January of 1998 and August of 2003. Their ages at the time of surgery ranged from 13 to 19 years. Distraction was started at 5 days after a Le Fort I osteotomy at a rate of I mm per day for 10 to 15 days. All patients used the Rigid External Distraction I system. After distraction was completed, the device was left in place for another 5 to 6 weeks for bony consolidation. When this was completed, an orthodontic face mask was used with elastic traction for 5 to 6 weeks. The follow-tip period ranged from 1 to 6 years. Results: The mean distraction length was 13.6 mm immediately after distraction, 10.8 mm at 6 months after distraction, and 10.4 mm between the 1- and 6-year follow-up period, resulting in relapse rate of 23.0 percent. In three children with mixed dentition, the ANB angle ranged from 7.1 to 8.5 degrees immediately after distraction, from 2.8 to 4.0 degrees 6 months postoperatively, and from 0.4 to degree 5 years postoperatively. Therefore, the growth rate of the distracted maxilla was lower than that of the mandible in those three children. Conclusion: The results suggest that greater anterior overcorrection of the hypoplastic maxilla is needed in the growing child than in adults to compensate for a partial relapse and growth deficit.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1212
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   USE OF DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS FOR MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS [J].
BLOCK, MS ;
BRISTER, GD .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (03) :282-286
[2]   ANTERIOR MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT USING TOOTH-SUPPORTED DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS [J].
BLOCK, MS ;
CERVINI, D ;
CHANG, A ;
GOTTSEGEN, GB .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 53 (05) :561-565
[3]   Advancement of the midface using distraction techniques [J].
Cedars, MG ;
Linck, DL ;
Chin, M ;
Toth, BA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 103 (02) :429-441
[4]   Le Fort III advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices [J].
Chin, M ;
Toth, BA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 100 (04) :819-830
[5]  
CLEALL J F, 1965, Angle Orthod, V35, P23
[6]  
COHEN SR, 1998, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V101, P951
[7]  
FIGUEROA A, 2001, CRANIOFACIAL DISTRAC
[8]   Midface distraction following Le Fort III and monobloc osteotomies: Problems and solutions [J].
Gosain, AK ;
Santoro, TD ;
Havlik, RJ ;
Cohen, SR ;
Holmes, RE .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (06) :1797-1808
[9]   Maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate children using an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device: A report of 2 cases [J].
Harada, K ;
Baba, Y ;
Ohyama, K ;
Enomoto, S .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 59 (12) :1492-1496
[10]   Midfacial distraction osteogenesis without major osteotomies:: A report on the first clinical application [J].
Hierl, T ;
Klöppel, R ;
Hemprich, A .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (06) :1667-1672