The scenario-based generalization of radiation therapy margins

被引:19
作者
Fredriksson, Albin [1 ]
Bokrantz, Rasmus [1 ]
机构
[1] RaySearch Labs, Sveavagen 44, SE-11134 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
imrt; impt; robustness; uncertainties; optimization; GEOMETRIC UNCERTAINTIES; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; PROTON THERAPY; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY; SENSITIVITY; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/2067
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
We give a scenario-based treatment plan optimization formulation that is equivalent to planning with geometric margins if the scenario doses are calculated using the static dose cloud approximation. If the scenario doses are instead calculated more accurately, then our formulation provides a novel robust planning method that overcomes many of the difficulties associated with previous scenario-based robust planning methods. In particular, our method protects only against uncertainties that can occur in practice, it gives a sharp dose fall-off outside high dose regions, and it avoids underdosage of the target in 'easy' scenarios. The method shares the benefits of the previous scenario-based robust planning methods over geometric margins for applications where the static dose cloud approximation is inaccurate, such as irradiation with few fields and irradiation with ion beams. These properties are demonstrated on a suite of phantom cases planned for treatment with scanned proton beams subject to systematic setup uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:2067 / 2082
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: dose-painting by numbers [J].
Bentzen, SM .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (02) :112-117
[2]   An analytical approximation of the Bragg curve for therapeutic proton beams [J].
Bortfeld, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (12) :2024-2033
[3]   Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Unkelbach, Jan ;
Trofimov, Alexei ;
Madden, Thomas ;
Kooy, Hanne ;
Bortfeld, Thomas ;
Craft, David .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (03) :591-608
[4]   Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy. I. The effect of shift invariance [J].
Craig, T ;
Battista, J ;
Van Dyk, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) :2001-2011
[5]   Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial [J].
Dearnaley, David ;
Syndikus, Isabel ;
Sumo, Georges ;
Bidmead, Margaret ;
Bloomfield, David ;
Clark, Catharine ;
Gao, Annie ;
Hassan, Shama ;
Horwich, Alan ;
Huddart, Robert ;
Khoo, Vincent ;
Kirkbride, Peter ;
Mayles, Helen ;
Mayles, Philip ;
Naismith, Olivia ;
Parker, Chris ;
Patterson, Helen ;
Russell, Martin ;
Scrase, Christopher ;
South, Chris ;
Staffurth, John ;
Hall, Emma .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (01) :43-54
[6]   Maximizing the probability of satisfying the clinical goals in radiation therapy treatment planning under setup uncertainty [J].
Fredriksson, Albin ;
Forsgren, Anders ;
Hardemark, Bjorn .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (07) :3992-3999
[7]   A critical evaluation of worst case optimization methods for robust intensity-modulated proton therapy planning [J].
Fredriksson, Albin ;
Bokrantz, Rasmus .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) :48-58
[8]   A characterization of robust radiation therapy treatment planning methods-from expected value to worst case optimization [J].
Fredriksson, Albin .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (08) :5169-5181
[9]   Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy [J].
Fredriksson, Albin ;
Forsgren, Anders ;
Hardemark, Bjorn .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (03) :1672-1684
[10]  
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 2010, J ICRU, V10