Disappearance of endomysial antibodies in treated celiac disease does not indicate histological recovery

被引:132
作者
Dickey, W [1 ]
Hughes, DF
McMillan, SA
机构
[1] Altnagelvin Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Londonderry BT47 6SB, North Ireland
[2] Altnagelvin Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Londonderry BT47 6SB, North Ireland
[3] Royal Victoria Hosp, Reg Immunol Lab, Belfast BT12 6BA, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01838.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Although serum IgA-class endomysial antibody (EmA) has high sensitivity for villous atrophy (VA) in patients with untreated celiac disease, few studies have attempted to correlate EmA seroconversion with histological recovery after starting a gluten-free diet. We prospectively studied changes in EmA status and in duodenal histology of seropositive patients after dietary treatment. METHODS: Patients with VA and EmA had repeat EmA testing at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting gluten-free diet, plus assessment of dietary compliance by dietitians and follow-up duodenal biopsy at 12 months. VA before and after treatment was classified as partial (P), subtotal (ST), and total (T). RESULTS: Of 77 patients with newly diagnosed VA and without IgA deficiency, 62 (81%) had EmA: 46 of 57 (81%) with T or STVA and 16 of 20 (80%) with PVA. Of 53 initially EmA-positive patients who completed study criteria, EmA was undetectable in 31 patients (58%) after 3 months' diet, in 40 (75%) after 6 months, and in 46 (87%) after 12 months. However, only 21 patients (40%), all seronegative by 12 months, had complete villous recovery. Only three (33%) of 10 patients with persisting ST or TVA and two (9%) of 22 with PVA remained EmA positive. Four of the five patients with persisting EmA had poor dietary compliance. CONCLUSIONS: EmA is a poor predictor of persisting VA after patients have started gluten-free diet, although it may be of value in monitoring dietary compliance. Although then are no clear guidelines regarding the need for follow-up biopsy, EmA seroconversion cannot substitute. The apparent association between dietary compliance and seroconversion suggests that gluten intake may determine whether untreated celiac patients are EmA positive or negative for a given degree of small bowel damage. (Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:712-714. (C) 2000 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology).
引用
收藏
页码:712 / 714
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Value of serologic markers for clinical diagnosis and population studies of coeliac disease [J].
Ascher, H ;
HahnZoric, M ;
Hanson, LA ;
Kilander, AF ;
Nilsson, LA ;
Tlaskalova, H .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 31 (01) :61-67
[2]   Follow-up of celiac disease with D-xylose breath test [J].
Casellas, F ;
DeTorres, I ;
Malagelada, JR .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1996, 41 (10) :2106-2111
[3]   Association between serum levels of total IgA and IgA class endomysial and antigliadin antibodies: Implications for coeliac disease screening [J].
Dickey, W ;
McMillan, SA ;
McCrum, EE ;
Evans, AE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 1997, 9 (06) :559-562
[4]   Autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase as predictors of celiac disease [J].
Dieterich, W ;
Laag, E ;
Schöpper, H ;
Volta, U ;
Ferguson, A ;
Gillett, H ;
Riecken, EO ;
Schuppan, D .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 115 (06) :1317-1321
[5]   Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease [J].
Dieterich, W ;
Ehnis, T ;
Bauer, M ;
Donner, P ;
Volta, U ;
Riecken, EO ;
Schuppan, D .
NATURE MEDICINE, 1997, 3 (07) :797-801
[6]  
Feighery C, 1998, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, V10, P919
[7]   ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY - IS IT THE BEST SCREENING-TEST FOR CELIAC-DISEASE [J].
FERREIRA, M ;
DAVIES, SL ;
BUTLER, M ;
SCOTT, D ;
CLARK, M ;
KUMAR, P .
GUT, 1992, 33 (12) :1633-1637
[8]   MALIGNANCY IN CELIAC-DISEASE - EFFECT OF A GLUTEN FREE DIET [J].
HOLMES, GKT ;
PRIOR, P ;
LANE, MR ;
POPE, D ;
ALLAN, RN .
GUT, 1989, 30 (03) :333-338
[9]   GLUTEN, MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX, AND THE SMALL-INTESTINE - A MOLECULAR AND IMMUNOBIOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE SPECTRUM OF GLUTEN SENSITIVITY (CELIAC SPRUE) [J].
MARSH, MN .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 102 (01) :330-354
[10]  
McMillan SA, 1998, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V33, P499, DOI 10.1080/00365529850172061