Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as Predictor of Therapy Response in an Animal Model of Ewing Sarcoma

被引:39
|
作者
Reichardt, Wilfried [1 ]
Juettner, Eva [2 ]
Uhl, Markus [1 ]
Elverfeldt, Dominik V. [1 ]
Kontny, Udo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Radiol Med Phys, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Pediat Oncol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
MRI; Ewing sarcoma; bone tumor; diffusion-weighted imaging; VASCULAR TARGETING AGENT; IN-VIVO ASSESSMENT; TUMOR NECROSIS; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; PHOSPHATE; BIOMARKER; BONE; MRI;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e31819dcc84
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for monitoring dose-dependent tumor response in a mouse-xenograft model of Ewing sarcoma after administration of treosulfan in different dosages. Materials and Methods: Ewing sarcoma implanted orthotopically into the left thigh of non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice were evaluated with a 9.4 T MR unit by using a specific mouse whole body coil. Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences, T1-weighted spin-echo sequences, and transverse echo-planar DWI examinations were performed at baseline, 24 hours and 72 hours after intraperitoneal injection of treosulfan in 2 different doses. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the viable parts of the tumor was automatically calculated from DWI imaging findings. These findings were correlated with histopathologic results at each time point. Volumetric measurements were performed by summing up the regions of interest in consecutive slices. Results: T1- and T2-weighted images before administration of treosulfan showed viable tumor tissue with small necrotic areas. At 24 hours after treosulfan injection, a significantly higher increase in ADC in the viable parts of the tumor could be observed in tumors of mice that had been injected with the higher dose of treosulfan compared with mice injected with the lower dose treosulfan, whereas no significant volumetric differences between the 2 different doses could be observed. Seventy-two hours after injection of treosulfan the ADC values in the viable parts of the tumor of mice treated with the high dose of treosulfan further increased and the tumor volume in the high-dose group was now significantly lower than in the low-dose group. Conclusion: Compared with volumetric measurements, DWI of the viable tumor parts could be used to discriminate between the effects of 2 different dosages at an earlier time point than volumetric measurements in an animal model in vivo. This method could be especially useful for monitoring drug effects in phase I/II clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 303
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation of Ewing sarcoma from osteosarcoma
    Parlak, Safak
    Ergen, F. Bilge
    Yuksel, Gokce Yildirim
    Karakaya, Jale
    Aydin, Guzide Burca
    Kosemehmetoglu, Kemal
    Aydingoz, Ustun
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (10) : 2023 - 2030
  • [2] Diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation of Ewing sarcoma from osteosarcoma
    Şafak Parlak
    F. Bilge Ergen
    Gökçe Yıldırım Yüksel
    Jale Karakaya
    Güzide Burça Aydın
    Kemal Kösemehmetoğlu
    Üstün Aydıngöz
    Skeletal Radiology, 2021, 50 : 2023 - 2030
  • [3] A Pitfall for Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging When Assessing the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ewing Sarcoma
    Kasalak, Omer
    Suurmeijer, Albert J. H.
    De Haan, Jacco J.
    Adams, Hugo J. A.
    Jutte, Paul C.
    Kwee, Thomas C.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 18 (04) : 249 - 250
  • [4] Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging assessment of chemotherapy treatment response of pediatric osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma malignant bone tumors
    Degnan, Andrew J.
    Chung, Chul Y.
    Shah, Amisha J.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2018, 47 : 9 - 13
  • [5] Diffusion-weighted imaging of the pancreas
    Gruenberg, K.
    Grenacher, L.
    Klauss, M.
    RADIOLOGE, 2011, 51 (03): : 186 - +
  • [6] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in assessing cervical tumour response to nonsurgical therapy
    Rizzo, S.
    Summers, P.
    Raimondi, S.
    Belmonte, M.
    Maniglio, M.
    Landoni, F.
    Colombo, N.
    Bellomi, M.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2011, 116 (05): : 766 - 780
  • [7] Assessing Bladder Radiotherapy Response With Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis
    Hafeez, S.
    Koh, M.
    Jones, K.
    El Ghzal, A.
    D'Arcy, J.
    Kumar, P.
    Khoo, V
    Lalondrelle, S.
    McDonald, F.
    Thompson, A.
    Scurr, E.
    Sohaib, A.
    Huddart, R.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 34 (10) : 630 - 641
  • [8] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting the response of ocular melanoma to proton beam therapy: initial results
    Foti, Pietro Valerio
    Farina, Renato
    Coronella, Maria
    Palmucci, Stefano
    Montana, Angelo
    Sigona, Alessandra
    Reibaldi, Michele
    Longo, Antonio
    Russo, Andrea
    Avitabile, Teresio
    Caltabiano, Rosario
    Puzzo, Lidia
    Ragusa, Marco
    Mariotti, Cesare
    Milone, Pietro
    Ettorre, Giovanni Carlo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (06): : 526 - 535
  • [9] Diffusion-weighted imaging does not seem to be a predictor of consistency in pituitary adenomas
    Barbosa, Monique Alvares
    Pereira, Eduardo Giardini Rodovalhe
    Pereira, Paulo Jose da Mata
    Guasti, Andre Accioly
    Andreiuolo, Felipe
    Chimelli, Leila
    Kasuki, Leandro
    Ventura, Nina
    Gadelha, Monica R.
    PITUITARY, 2024, 27 (02) : 187 - 196
  • [10] Chemotherapy response evaluation using diffusion weighted MRI in Ewing Sarcoma: A single center experience
    Kayal, Esha Baidya
    Alampally, Jayendra Tiru
    Sharma, Raju
    Bakhshi, Sameer
    Mehndiratta, Amit
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Chandrashekhara, S. H.
    Jana, Manisha
    Bhalla, Ashu Seith
    Sharma, Mehar Chand
    Mridha, Asit Ranjan
    Vishnubhatla, Sreenivas
    Kandasamy, Devasenathipathy
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2023, 64 (04) : 1508 - 1517