Effects of Transit-Oriented Development on Trip Generation, Distribution, and Mode Share in Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Maryland

被引:33
作者
Zamir, Kiana Roshan [1 ]
Nasri, Arefeh [1 ]
Baghaei, Babak [1 ]
Mahapatra, Subrat [2 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Maryland State Highway Adm, Travel Forecasting & Anal Unit, Off Planning & Preliminary Engn, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TRAVEL;
D O I
10.3141/2413-05
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
It is claimed that transit-oriented developments (TODs) have the ability to reduce the number and average lengths of auto trips by providing better nonautomobile accessibility to jobs and other destinations and to encourage sustainable modes (i.e., transit, walking, and biking) by facilitating a pedestrian-friendly environment and transit services. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of TODs in the Washington, D.C., and Baltimore, Maryland, metropolitan areas that was performed to investigate whether TODs actually have those hypothesized impacts. Trip generation, trip length, and mode share were modeled in the two case study areas through the use of the most recent local household travel survey data and advanced econometric analysis methods. The findings showed that, overall, people living in TODs made more trips by all modes of transportation but fewer trips by auto. The results also showed that TOD residents tended to travel shorter distances by all modes of transportation, a finding that implies the selection of closer destinations for their activities. Trips originating from TODs had substantially higher nonauto mode shares in both Baltimore and Washington, D.C., after relevant socioeconomic and demographic factors were controlled for. Significant differences in the effectiveness of TODs in these two metropolitan areas were also found to be due to TOD locations, transit system availability and level of service, and TOD resident characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 53
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Airington G. B., 2008, 128 TCRP NAT AC TRAN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, CHAR RAIL FERR STAT
[3]  
Bernick M., 1997, Transit villages in the 21st century
[4]  
Calthorpe P., 1993, The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream
[5]  
Cao X., 2006, 85 ANN M TRANSP RES
[6]   Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey [J].
Cervero, R .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1996, 30 (05) :361-377
[7]   Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design [J].
Cervero, R ;
Kockelman, K .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 2 (03) :199-219
[8]  
CERVERO R., 1993, RIDERSHIP IMPACTS TR
[9]  
Cervero R., 2008, J PUBLIC TRANSPORT, V11, P1, DOI [DOI 10.5038/2375-0901.11.3.1, 10.5038/2375-0901.11.3.1]
[10]   Does TOD Need the T?: On the Importance of Factors Other Than Rail Access [J].
Chatman, Daniel G. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2013, 79 (01) :17-31