Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis

被引:46
|
作者
Zhao, Ying Jiao [1 ]
Khoo, Ai Leng [1 ]
Tan, Gloria [2 ]
Teng, Monica [1 ]
Tee, Caroline [3 ]
Tan, Ban Hock [4 ]
Ong, Benjamin [2 ]
Lim, Boon Peng [1 ]
Chai, Louis Yi Ann [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Healthcare Grp, Grp Corp Dev, Pharm & Therapeut Off, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Hlth Sci Author, Hlth Prod Regulat Grp, Pharmacoecon & Drug Utilisat, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Pharm, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Gen Internal Med & Infect Dis, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Univ Med Cluster, Div Infect Dis, Singapore, Singapore
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
CELL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA; DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL; ANTIFUNGAL PROPHYLAXIS; NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS; INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; VS; FLUCONAZOLE;
D O I
10.1128/AAC.01985-15
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fluconazole, itraconazole capsule and solution, posaconazole, and voriconazole was conducted. The outcomes of interest included the incidences of IFIs and deaths. This was coupled with a cost-effectiveness analysis from patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Probabilities of transitions between health states were derived from the NMA. Resource use and costs were obtained from the Singapore health care institution. Data on 5,505 participants in 21 RCTs were included. Other than itraconazole capsule, all triazole antifungals were effective in reducing IFIs. Posaconazole was better than fluconazole (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.73]) and itraconazole capsule (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97]), but not voriconazole (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.43 to 4.01]), in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole significantly reduced all-cause deaths, compared to placebo, fluconazole, and itraconazole solution (OR, 0.49 to 0.54 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for itraconazole solution was lower than that for posaconazole (Singapore dollars [SGD] 12,546 versus SGD 26,817 per IFI avoided and SGD 5,844 versus SGD 12,423 per LY saved) for transplant patients. For leukemia patients, itraconazole solution was the dominant strategy. Voriconazole was dominated by posaconazole. All triazole antifungals except itraconazole capsule were effective in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole was more efficacious in reducing IFIs and all-cause deaths than were fluconazole and itraconazole. Both itraconazole solution and posaconazole were cost-effective in the Singapore health care setting.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 386
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A network meta-analysis of primary prophylaxis for invasive fungal infection in haematological patients
    Leonart, L. P.
    Tonin, F. S.
    Ferreira, V. L.
    Penteado, S. T. S.
    Wiens, A.
    Motta, F. A.
    Pontarolo, R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 42 (05) : 530 - 538
  • [2] In meta-analysis itraconazole is superior to fluconazole for prophylaxis of systemic fungal infection in the treatment of haematological malignancy
    Prentice, AG
    Glasmacher, A
    Djulbegovic, B
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2006, 132 (05) : 656 - 658
  • [3] Posaconazole A Pharmacoeconomic Review of its Use in the Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Disease in Immunocompromised Hosts
    Lyseng-Williamson, Katherine A.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2011, 29 (03) : 251 - 268
  • [4] Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of fluconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing first consolidation chemotherapy
    Heng, Siow-Chin
    Slavin, Monica A.
    Al-Badriyeh, Daoud
    Kirsa, Sue
    Seymour, John F.
    Grigg, Andrew
    Thursky, Karin
    Bajel, Ashish
    Nation, Roger L.
    Kong, David C. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2013, 68 (07) : 1669 - 1678
  • [5] Economic Evaluation of Posaconazole Versus Fluconazole or Itraconazole in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infection in High-Risk Neutropenic Patients in Sweden
    Johan Lundberg
    Martin Höglund
    Magnus Björkholm
    Örjan Åkerborg
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2014, 34 : 483 - 489
  • [6] Network meta-analysis of triazole, polyene, and echinocandin antifungal agents in invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in patients with hematological malignancies
    Zeng, Huilan
    Wu, Zhuman
    Yu, Bing
    Wang, Bo
    Wu, Chengnian
    Wu, Jie
    Lai, Jing
    Gao, Xiaoyan
    Chen, Jie
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [7] Primary Fungal Prophylaxis in Hematological Malignancy: a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lee, Cho-Hao
    Lin, Chin
    Ho, Ching-Liang
    Lin, Jung-Chung
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 62 (08)
  • [8] Economic Evaluation of Posaconazole Versus Fluconazole or Itraconazole in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infection in High-Risk Neutropenic Patients in Sweden
    Lundberg, Johan
    Hoglund, Martin
    Bjorkholm, Magnus
    Akerborg, Orjan
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2014, 34 (07) : 483 - 489
  • [9] Efficacy of anti-fungal agents for invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients: A network meta-analysis
    Liu, Yusi
    Lan, Chunhai
    Qin, Sibei
    Qin, Zhuo
    Zhang, Zhiqiang
    Zhang, Peng
    Cao, Weiling
    MYCOSES, 2022, 65 (10) : 906 - 917
  • [10] Cost Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. Fluconazole/Itraconazole in Prophylactic Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections in Mexico
    Rely, Kely
    Alexandre, Pierre K.
    Salinas Escudero, Guillermo
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (05) : S39 - S42