Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts

被引:94
|
作者
Idowu, O. J. [1 ]
van Es, H. M. [1 ]
Abawi, G. S. [2 ]
Wolfe, D. W. [3 ]
Schindelbeck, R. R. [1 ]
Moebius-Clune, B. N. [1 ]
Gugino, B. K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, NYSAES, Dept Plant Pathol, Geneva, NY 14456 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Hort, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
soil quality; soil health; tillage; soil quality indicators; Cornell Soil Health Test; CROPPING SYSTEM INFLUENCES; ORGANIC-MATTER; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; PENETRATION RESISTANCE; GREAT-PLAINS; TILLAGE; FIELD; CARBON; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1017/S1742170509990068
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Understanding the response of soil quality indicators to changes in management practices is essential for sustainable land management. Soil quality indicators were measured for 2 years under established experiments with varying management histories and durations at four locations in New York State. The Willsboro (clay loam) and Aurora (silt loam) experiments were established in 1992, comparing no-till (NT) to plow-till (PT) management under corn (Zea mays L.)-soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation. The Chazy (silt loam) trial was established in 1973 as a factorial experiment comparing NT versus PT and the crop harvesting method (corn silage versus corn grain). The Geneva (silt loam) experiment was established in 2003 with vegetable rotations with and without intervening soil building crops, each under three tillage methods (NT, PT and zone-till (ZT)) and three cover cropping systems (none, rye and vetch). Physical indicators measured were wet aggregate stability (WAS), available water capacity (AWC) and surface hardness (SH) and subsurface hardness (SSH). Soil biological indicators included organic matter (OM), active carbon (AC), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) and root disease potential (RDP). Chemical indicators included pH, P, K, Mg, Fe, Mn and Zn. Results from the Willsboro and Aurora sites showed significant tillage effects for several indicators including WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, P, K, Mg, Fe and Mn. Generally, the NT treatment had better indicator values than the PT treatments. At the Chazy site, WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, K and Mg showed significant differences for tillage and/or harvest method, also with NT showing better indicator values compared to PT and corn grain better than corn silage. Aggregate stability was on average 2.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites. OM was also 1.2, 1.1 and 1.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites, respectively. At the Geneva site WAS, SH, AC, PMN, pH, P, K and Zn showed significant tillage effects. The cover crop effect was only significant for SH and PMN measurements. Indicators that gave consistent performance across locations included WAS, OM and AC, while PMN and RDP were site and management dependent. The composite soil health index (CSHI) significantly differentiated between contrasting management practices. The CSHI for the Willsboro, site was 71% for NT and 59% for PT, while at the Aurora site it was 61% for NT and 48% for PT after 15 years of tillage treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 224
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Soil health and microplastics: a review of the impacts of microplastic contamination on soil properties
    Chia, Rogers Wainkwa
    Lee, Jin-Yong
    Jang, Jiwook
    Kim, Heejung
    Kwon, Kideok D.
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2022, 22 (10) : 2690 - 2705
  • [32] Organic management and soil health promote nutrient use efficiency
    Toda, Misato
    Walder, Florian
    van der Heijden, Marcel G. A.
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 2 (03): : 215 - 224
  • [33] Evaluation of β-Glucosidase Activity as a Soil Quality Indicator for the Soil Management Assessment Framework
    Stott, D. E.
    Andrews, S. S.
    Liebig, M. A.
    Wienhold, B. J.
    Karlen, D. L.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2010, 74 (01) : 107 - 119
  • [34] A pedo-climatic approach towards soil health assessment: Soil texture-specific scoring curves on arable land in Norway
    Boe, Frederik
    Stolte, Jannes
    van Schaik, Loes
    Ritsema, Coen
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 40 (01)
  • [35] Visual soil evaluation: A summary of some applications and potential developments for agriculture
    Ball, Bruce C.
    Guimaraes, Rachel M. L.
    Cloy, Joanna M.
    Hargreaves, Paul R.
    Shepherd, T. Graham
    McKenzie, Blair M.
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2017, 173 : 114 - 124
  • [36] Collected knowledge on the impacts of agricultural soil management practices in Europe
    Paz, Ana Marta
    Castanheira, Nadia
    Miloczki, Julia
    Carrasco, Mariana
    Vicente, Carolina
    Carranca, Corina
    Goncalves, Maria Conceicao
    Mihelic, Rok
    Visser, Saskia
    Keesstra, Saskia
    Chenu, Claire
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2024, 75 (02)
  • [37] Soil microbiological properties affected by land use, management, and time since deforestations and crop establishment
    Eleftheriadis, Alexandros
    Turrion, Maria-Belen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2014, 62 : 138 - 144
  • [38] Management sensitivity, repeatability, and consistency of interpretation of soil health indicators on organic farms in southwestern Ontario
    Hargreaves, Sarah K.
    DeJong, Paul
    Laing, Ken
    McQuail, Tony
    Van Eerd, Laura L.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2019, 99 (04) : 508 - 519
  • [39] Soil nematode communities differ across long-term land-use intensities in relation to soil physical, chemical, and biological parameters
    Arseneault, Hannah
    Lynch, Derek H.
    Nyiraneza, Judith
    Stiles, Kyra
    Mills, Aaron
    Fraser, Tandra
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2024, 104 (04) : 482 - 495
  • [40] Assessing Impacts of Land Use Change on Soil Quality Indicators in a Loessial Soil in Golestan Province, Iran
    Ayoubi, S.
    Khormali, F.
    Sahrawat, K. L.
    de Lima, A. C. Rodrigues
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 13 (05): : 727 - 742