Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts

被引:94
|
作者
Idowu, O. J. [1 ]
van Es, H. M. [1 ]
Abawi, G. S. [2 ]
Wolfe, D. W. [3 ]
Schindelbeck, R. R. [1 ]
Moebius-Clune, B. N. [1 ]
Gugino, B. K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, NYSAES, Dept Plant Pathol, Geneva, NY 14456 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Hort, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
soil quality; soil health; tillage; soil quality indicators; Cornell Soil Health Test; CROPPING SYSTEM INFLUENCES; ORGANIC-MATTER; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; PENETRATION RESISTANCE; GREAT-PLAINS; TILLAGE; FIELD; CARBON; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1017/S1742170509990068
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Understanding the response of soil quality indicators to changes in management practices is essential for sustainable land management. Soil quality indicators were measured for 2 years under established experiments with varying management histories and durations at four locations in New York State. The Willsboro (clay loam) and Aurora (silt loam) experiments were established in 1992, comparing no-till (NT) to plow-till (PT) management under corn (Zea mays L.)-soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation. The Chazy (silt loam) trial was established in 1973 as a factorial experiment comparing NT versus PT and the crop harvesting method (corn silage versus corn grain). The Geneva (silt loam) experiment was established in 2003 with vegetable rotations with and without intervening soil building crops, each under three tillage methods (NT, PT and zone-till (ZT)) and three cover cropping systems (none, rye and vetch). Physical indicators measured were wet aggregate stability (WAS), available water capacity (AWC) and surface hardness (SH) and subsurface hardness (SSH). Soil biological indicators included organic matter (OM), active carbon (AC), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) and root disease potential (RDP). Chemical indicators included pH, P, K, Mg, Fe, Mn and Zn. Results from the Willsboro and Aurora sites showed significant tillage effects for several indicators including WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, P, K, Mg, Fe and Mn. Generally, the NT treatment had better indicator values than the PT treatments. At the Chazy site, WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, K and Mg showed significant differences for tillage and/or harvest method, also with NT showing better indicator values compared to PT and corn grain better than corn silage. Aggregate stability was on average 2.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites. OM was also 1.2, 1.1 and 1.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites, respectively. At the Geneva site WAS, SH, AC, PMN, pH, P, K and Zn showed significant tillage effects. The cover crop effect was only significant for SH and PMN measurements. Indicators that gave consistent performance across locations included WAS, OM and AC, while PMN and RDP were site and management dependent. The composite soil health index (CSHI) significantly differentiated between contrasting management practices. The CSHI for the Willsboro, site was 71% for NT and 59% for PT, while at the Aurora site it was 61% for NT and 48% for PT after 15 years of tillage treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 224
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impacts of selected management practices on soil quality in an irrigated arid agroecosystem
    Omer, M.
    Idowu, O. J.
    Ulery, A. L.
    VanLeeuwen, D.
    Guldan, S. J.
    Marsalis, M. A.
    Ghimire, R.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2020, 75 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [2] Biomass inputs drive agronomic management impacts on soil health
    Rubio, Valentina
    Nunez, Agustin
    Berger, Andres
    van Es, Harold
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 378
  • [3] The visual evaluation of soil structure under arable management
    Askari, Mohammad Sadegh
    Cui, Junfang
    Holden, Nicholas M.
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2013, 134 : 1 - 10
  • [4] Soil health card development for efficient soil management in Haryana, India
    Purakayastha, T. J.
    Pathak, H.
    Kumari, Savita
    Biswas, Sunanda
    Chakrabarty, Bidisha
    Padaria, R. N.
    Kamble, Kalpana
    Pandey, Maneesh
    Sasmal, Subodh
    Singh, Anjali
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2019, 191 : 294 - 305
  • [5] Influence of cropping system and soil type on soil health
    Marshall, Carolyn B.
    Burton, David L.
    Heung, Brandon
    Lynch, Derek H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2021, 101 (04) : 626 - 640
  • [6] Impacts of Agricultural Management Practices on Soil Quality
    Ahamadou, Bocar
    Huang, Qiaoyun
    MOLECULAR ENVIRONMENTAL SOIL SCIENCE, 2013, : 429 - 480
  • [7] Assessing the impact of soil use and management systems on soil health in Southern Brazil
    Becker, Regiane Kazmierczak
    Galvao, Carolina Weigert
    Etto, Rafael Mazer
    Hyeda, Daiane
    de Paula, Ariane Lentice
    Schiebelbein, Luis Miguel
    Giarola, Neyde Fabiola Balarezo
    GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2025, 40
  • [8] A Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) Evaluation of Brazilian Sugarcane Expansion on Soil Quality
    Cherubin, Mauricio R.
    Karlen, Douglas L.
    Franco, Andre L. C.
    Cerri, Carlos E. P.
    Tormena, Cassio A.
    Cerri, Carlos C.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2016, 80 (01) : 215 - 226
  • [9] Effects of Land Use and Soil Management on Soil Quality in India's Northeastern Himalayas
    Hinge, Gilbert
    Surampalli, Rao Y.
    Goyal, Manish Kumar
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 145 (04)
  • [10] Agriculture Management Impacts on Soil Properties and Hydrological Response in Istria (Croatia)
    Igor, Bogunovic
    Josip, Telak Leon
    Paulo, Pereira
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (02):