Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction

被引:199
作者
Stolzenberg, RM [1 ]
Relles, DA [1 ]
机构
[1] RAND CORP,SANTA MONICA,CA 90406
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2657318
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
We provide mathematical tools to assist intuition about selection bias in concrete empirical analyses. These new tools do not offer a general solution to the selection bins problem; no method now does that. Rather, the techniques we present offer a new decomposition of selection bias. This decomposition permits an analyst to develop intuition and make reasoned judgments about the sources, severity, and direction of sample selection bins in a particular analysis. When combined with simulation results, also presented in this paper our decomposition of bias also permits a reasoned empirically-informed judgment of when the well-known two-step estimator of Heckman (1976, 1979) is likely to increase or decrease the accuracy of regression coefficient estimates. We also use simulations to confirm mathematical derivations.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 507
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Identification Problems in the Social Sciences
[2]   AN INTRODUCTION TO SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS IN SOCIOLOGICAL DATA [J].
BERK, RA .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1983, 48 (03) :386-398
[3]  
BRUAN H, 1982, RECONSTRUCTION IDEAL
[4]  
Duan N., 1984, J BUS ECON STAT, V2, P283, DOI DOI 10.1080/07350015.1984.10509396
[5]  
GOLDBERGER A, 1980, UNPUB ABNORMAL SELEC
[6]  
HANUSHEK EA, 1977, STATISTICAL METHODS
[8]  
HECKMAN J, 1980, EVALUATION STUDIES R, P69
[9]   SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS AS A SPECIFICATION ERROR [J].
HECKMAN, JJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (01) :153-161
[10]  
HECKMAN JJ, 1976, ANN ECON SOC MEAS, V5, P475