Severe Maternal Morbidity and the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Massachusetts

被引:43
作者
Belanoff, Candice
Declercq, Eugene R.
Diop, Hafsatou
Gopal, Daksha
Kotelchuck, Milton
Luke, Barbara
Thien Nguyen
Stern, Judy E.
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Massachusetts Dept Publ Hlth, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Ctr Child & Adolescent Hlth Res & Policy, Boston, MA USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; ADVERSE PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES; DATABASE; SUBFERTILITY; WOMEN; AGE;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001292
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether risk of severe maternal morbidity at delivery differed for women who conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART), those with indicators of subfertility but no ART ("subfertile"), and those who had neither ART nor subfertility ("fertile"). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was part of the larger Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. To construct the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology database and identify ART deliveries, we linked ART treatment records to birth certificates and maternal and infant hospitalization records occurring in Massachusetts between 2004 and 2010. An algorithm of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis and procedure codes identified severe maternal morbidity. We used logistic generalized estimating equations to estimate odds of severe maternal morbidity associated with fertility status, adjusting for maternal demographic and health factors and gestational age, stratifying on plurality and method of delivery. RESULTS: The prevalence of severe maternal morbidity among this population (n=458,918) was 1.16%. The overall, crude prevalences of severe maternal morbidity among fertile, subfertile, and ART deliveries were 1.09%, 1.44%, and 3.14%, respectively. The most common indicator of severe maternal morbidity was blood transfusion. In multivariable analyses, among singletons, ART was associated with increased odds of severe maternal morbidity compared with both fertile (vaginal: adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78-2.88; cesarean: adjusted OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.40-1.98, respectively) and subfertile (vaginal: adjusted OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.30-3.00; cesarean: adjusted OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.30-2.35, respectively) deliveries. Among twins, only cesarean ART deliveries had significantly greater severe maternal morbidity compared with cesarean fertile deliveries (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-1.93). CONCLUSION: Women who conceive through ART may have elevated risk of severe maternal morbidity at delivery, largely indicated by blood transfusion, even when compared with a subfertile population. Further research should elucidate mechanisms underlying this risk.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 534
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 'Living each week as unique': Maternal fears in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies
    Netto Dornelles, Lia Mara
    MacCallum, Fiona
    Sobreira Lopes, Rita de Cassia
    Piccinini, Cesar Augusto
    Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi
    MIDWIFERY, 2014, 30 (03) : E115 - E120
  • [22] Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes in childhood cancer survivors
    Keefe, Kimberly W.
    Lanes, Andrea
    Stratton, Kayla
    Green, Daniel M.
    Chow, Eric J.
    Oeffinger, Kevin C.
    Barton, Sara
    Diller, Lisa
    Yasui, Yutaka
    Leisenring, Wendy M.
    Armstrong, Gregory T.
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.
    CANCER, 2024, 130 (01) : 128 - 139
  • [23] The Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes of Twin Pregnancies with Preeclampsia and Their Association with Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Retrospective Study
    Li, Huanrong
    Lyu, Meilu
    Zhao, Ruqian
    Zang, Yuqin
    Huang, Pengzhu
    Li, Jie
    Yan, Ye
    Wang, Yingmei
    Li, Zengyan
    Han, Cha
    Xue, Fengxia
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [24] Assisted reproductive technology use in the United States: a population assessment
    Tierney, Katherine
    Cai, Yong
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (06) : 1136 - +
  • [25] Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology
    Wennberg, Anna Lena
    Opdahl, Signe
    Bergh, Christina
    Henningsen, Anna-Karina Aaris
    Gissler, Mika
    Romundstad, Liv Bente
    Pinborg, Anja
    Tiitinen, Aila
    Skjaerven, Rolv
    Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (05) : 1142 - +
  • [26] Maternal Postpartum Hospitalization Following Assisted Reproductive Technology Births
    Declercq, Eugene
    Stern, Judy E.
    Luke, Barbara
    Cabral, Howard
    Gopal, Daksha
    Belanoff, Candice
    Diop, Hafsatou
    Kotelchuck, Milton
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (06) : E64 - E65
  • [27] Impact of fertility treatment on severe maternal morbidity
    Wang, Erica T.
    Ozimek, John A.
    Greene, Naomi
    Ramos, Lauren
    Vyas, Nina
    Kilpatrick, Sarah J.
    Pisarska, Margareta D.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (02) : 423 - 426
  • [28] Endometriomas and Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Flyckt, Rebecca
    Soto, Enrique
    Falcone, Tommaso
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 31 (02) : 164 - 172
  • [29] Reproduction beyond menopause: how old is too old for assisted reproductive technology?
    Banh, David
    Havemann, Dara L.
    Phelps, John Y.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2010, 27 (07) : 365 - 370
  • [30] Calculating cumulative live-birth rates from linked cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART): data from the Massachusetts SART CORS
    Stern, Judy E.
    Brown, Morton B.
    Luke, Barbara
    Wantman, Ethan
    Lederman, Avi
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    Hornstein, Mark D.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : 1334 - 1340