Randomized clinical trial of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy versus handsewn closure after distal pancreatectomy

被引：38

作者：

Uemura, K. ^{[1
]}

Satoi, S. ^{[2
]}

Motoi, F. ^{[3
]}

Kwon, M. ^{[2
]}

Unno, M. ^{[3
]}

Murakami, Y. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Hiroshima, Japan

[2] Kansai Med Univ, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan

[3] Tohoku Univ, Div Gastroenterol Surg, Dept Surg, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

来源：

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2017年 / 104卷 / 05期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1002/bjs.10458

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

BackgroundPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major cause of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy of the pancreatic stump decreased clinical POPF formation compared with handsewn closure after distal pancreatectomy. MethodsThis multicentre RCT was performed between April 2012 and June 2014. Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy were assigned randomly to either duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy or handsewn closure. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinical POPF. Secondary endpoints were rates of other complications and length of hospital stay. ResultsSome 80 patients were randomized, and 73 patients were evaluated in an intention-to-treat analysis: 36 in the pancreaticogastrostomy group and 37 in the handsewn closure group. The duration of operation was significantly longer in the pancreaticogastrostomy group than in the handsewn closure group (mean 268 versus 197min respectively; P<0001). The incidence of clinical POPF did not differ between groups (7 of 36 versus 7 of 37; odds ratio (OR) 103, 95 per cent c.i. 032 to 310; P = 1000). The rate of intra-abdominal fluid collection was significantly lower in the pancreaticogastrostomy group (6 of 36 versus 21 of 37; OR 015, 005 to 045; P<0001). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of other complications or length of hospital stay. ConclusionDuct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy did not reduce the incidence of clinical POPF compared with handsewn closure of the pancreatic stump after distal pancreatectomy. Registration number UMIN000007426 (http://www.umin.ac.jp). Pancreatic fistula rate similar

引用

页码：536 / 543

页数：8

共 31 条

[1]

Jimenez R.E., Hawkins W.G., Emerging strategies to prevent the development of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, Surgery, 152, pp. S64-S70, (2012)

[2]

Sell N.M., Pucci M.J., Gabale S., Leiby B.E., Rosato E.L., Winter J.M., Et al., The influence of transection site on the development of pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy: a review of 294 consecutive cases, Surgery, 157, pp. 1080-1087, (2015)

[3]

Zhang H., Zhu F., Shen M., Tian R., Shi C.J., Wang X., Et al., Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy, Br J Surg, 102, pp. 4-15, (2015)

[4]

Lillemoe K.D., Kaushal S., Cameron J.L., Sohn T.A., Pitt H.A., Yeo C.J., Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients, Ann Surg, 229, pp. 693-698, (1999)

[5]

Bilimoria M.M., Cormier J.N., Mun Y., Lee J.E., Evans D.B., Pisters P.W., Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation, Br J Surg, 90, pp. 190-196, (2003)

[6]

Farkas G., Leindler L., Marton J., Lazar G., Farkas G., PolysorbR (an absorbable lactomer) staples, a safe closure technique for distal pancreatic resection, World J Gastroenterol, 20, pp. 17 185-17 189, (2014)

[7]

Sadek S., Holdsworth R., Cuschieri A., Experience with pancreatic banding: results of a simple technique for dealing with the pancreatic remnant after distal partial pancreatectomy, Br J Surg, 75, pp. 486-487, (1988)

[8]

Wagner M., Gloor B., Ambuhl M., Worni M., Lutz J.A., Angst E., Et al., Roux-en-Y drainage of the pancreatic stump decreases pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatic resection, J Gastrointest Surg, 11, pp. 303-308, (2007)

[9]

Suzuki Y., Fujino Y., Tanioka Y., Hori Y., Ueda T., Takeyama Y., Et al., Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas, Br J Surg, 86, pp. 608-611, (1999)

[10]

Moriura S., Kimura A., Ikeda S., Iwatsuka Y., Ikezawa T., Naiki K., Closure of the distal pancreatic stump with a seromuscular flap, Surg Today, 25, pp. 992-994, (1995)

← 1 2 3 4 →