Sustainability perceptions of off-site manufacturing stakeholders in Australia

被引:132
作者
Hu, Xin [1 ]
Chong, Heap-Yih [2 ]
Wang, Xiangyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Australasian Joint Res Ctr Bldg Informat Modellin, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Design & Built Environm, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Tongji Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Sustainability; Perceptions; Off-site manufacturing; Stakeholders; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; OFFSITE CONSTRUCTION; ENERGY ANALYSIS; HONG-KONG; MANAGEMENT; PREFABRICATION; CONSEQUENCES; PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.258
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The popularity of developing off-site manufacturing (OSM) projects is increasing in the construction industry. Sustainability is an importance concern of OSM stakeholders, and it becomes imperative to comprehend the way these stakeholders perceive it. However, there is still a lack of related explorations in this research area. Thus, the research aims to identify sustainability perceptions of OSM stakeholders based on their business information. A qualitative content analysis was adopted to retrieve and analyze the business information from Australian OSM stakeholders' official websites. The results show 59 sustainability perceptions, with the most mentioned ones being "High quality", "Customer-focused approach and customization", "Cost effectiveness and affordability", and "Innovation". Moreover, the OSM stakeholders' sustainability perceptions have covered the social, environmental and economic sustain ability dimensions, and the social sustainability perceptions were more focused than others. The statistical analysis reveals that there are no significant differences between different types of OSM stakeholders regarding their top-ranked sustainability perceptions and their perception numbers. The research facilitates understanding of the nature of the OSM sustainability issue, and offers OSM stakeholders a platform of re-thinking their sustainability practice. It also builds a new foundation of developing sustainability management frameworks and assessment benchmarks for OSM projects. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 354
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]   An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing A case study using a lifecycle assessment framework [J].
Monahan, J. ;
Powell, J. C. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2011, 43 (01) :179-188
[42]  
Morgan D L, 1993, Qual Health Res, V3, P112, DOI 10.1177/104973239300300107
[43]   A review of construction companies' attitudes to sustainability [J].
Myers, Danny .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2005, 23 (08) :781-785
[44]   BIM Standard in Off-Site Construction [J].
Nawari, Nawari O. .
JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 18 (02) :107-113
[45]   Economics of on-site vs. off-site fabrication of rebar [J].
Polat, Gul ;
Arditi, David ;
Ballard, Glenn ;
Mungen, Ugur .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2006, 24 (11) :1185-1198
[46]   Barriers of Implementing Modern Methods of Construction [J].
Rahman, M. Motiar .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 30 (01) :69-77
[47]   Product-Oriented Information Delivery Framework for Multistory Modular Building Projects [J].
Ramaji, Issa J. ;
Memari, Ali M. ;
Messner, John I. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 31 (04)
[49]  
Shen L.-Y., 2007, J CIVIL ENG MANAGMEN, P273, DOI [10.3846/13923730.2007.9636447, DOI 10.3846/13923730.2007.9636447]
[50]   Implementing Sustainable Development in the Construction Industry: Constructors' Perspectives in the US and Korea [J].
Son, Hyojoo ;
Kim, Changwan ;
Chong, Wai Kiong ;
Chou, Jui-Sheng .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 19 (05) :337-347