Sustainability perceptions of off-site manufacturing stakeholders in Australia

被引:130
作者
Hu, Xin [1 ]
Chong, Heap-Yih [2 ]
Wang, Xiangyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Australasian Joint Res Ctr Bldg Informat Modellin, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Design & Built Environm, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Tongji Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Sustainability; Perceptions; Off-site manufacturing; Stakeholders; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; OFFSITE CONSTRUCTION; ENERGY ANALYSIS; HONG-KONG; MANAGEMENT; PREFABRICATION; CONSEQUENCES; PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.258
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The popularity of developing off-site manufacturing (OSM) projects is increasing in the construction industry. Sustainability is an importance concern of OSM stakeholders, and it becomes imperative to comprehend the way these stakeholders perceive it. However, there is still a lack of related explorations in this research area. Thus, the research aims to identify sustainability perceptions of OSM stakeholders based on their business information. A qualitative content analysis was adopted to retrieve and analyze the business information from Australian OSM stakeholders' official websites. The results show 59 sustainability perceptions, with the most mentioned ones being "High quality", "Customer-focused approach and customization", "Cost effectiveness and affordability", and "Innovation". Moreover, the OSM stakeholders' sustainability perceptions have covered the social, environmental and economic sustain ability dimensions, and the social sustainability perceptions were more focused than others. The statistical analysis reveals that there are no significant differences between different types of OSM stakeholders regarding their top-ranked sustainability perceptions and their perception numbers. The research facilitates understanding of the nature of the OSM sustainability issue, and offers OSM stakeholders a platform of re-thinking their sustainability practice. It also builds a new foundation of developing sustainability management frameworks and assessment benchmarks for OSM projects. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 354
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers
    Abidin, Nazirah Zainul
    [J]. HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 34 (04) : 421 - 426
  • [2] ATTITUDE-BEHAVIOR RELATIONS - THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS AND REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL-RESEARCH
    AJZEN, I
    FISHBEIN, M
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1977, 84 (05) : 888 - 918
  • [3] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [4] [Anonymous], J BEHAV EC
  • [5] Promoting Off-Site Construction: Future Challenges and Opportunities
    Arif, Mohammed
    Goulding, Jack
    Rahimian, Farzad Pour
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 18 (02) : 75 - 78
  • [6] Making a case for offsite construction in China
    Arif, Mohammed
    Egbu, Charles
    [J]. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 17 (06) : 536 - +
  • [7] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules
    Aye, Lu
    Ngo, T.
    Crawford, R. H.
    Gammampila, R.
    Mendis, P.
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 47 : 159 - 168
  • [8] Choice and delivery in housebuilding: lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders
    Barlow, J
    Childerhouse, P
    Gann, D
    Hong-Minh, S
    Naim, M
    Ozaki, R
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2003, 31 (02) : 134 - 145
  • [9] Attitude and behavioral factors in waste management in the construction industry of Malaysia
    Begum, Rawshan Ara
    Siwar, Chamhuri
    Pereira, Joy Jacqueline
    Jaafar, Abdul Hamid
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2009, 53 (06) : 321 - 328
  • [10] Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings
    Berardi, Umberto
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 20 (06) : 411 - 424