How do threshold firms sustain corporate entrepreneurship? The role of boards and absorptive capacity

被引:244
作者
Zahra, Shaker A. [3 ,4 ]
Filatotchev, Igor [5 ]
Wright, Mike [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Ctr Management Buy Out Res, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[2] Erasmus Univ, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Dept Strateg Management & Org, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Gary S Homes Ctr Entrepreneurship, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] City Univ London, Cass Business Sch, London EC1Y 8TZ, England
关键词
Absorptive capacity; Corporate entrepreneurship; Capability; Boards; Knowledge-based theory; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP; PERSPECTIVE; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; ACCOUNTABILITY; ADVANTAGE; DIRECTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As companies move from one stage of their cycle to the next, they often have to revamp their skills and build innovative capabilities to survive, achieve profitability, and stimulate growth. Corporate entrepreneurship (CE) activities give these firms a foundation for building and exploiting these capabilities. In turn, stimulating and sustaining CE requires the infusion of resources and new knowledge into the firm's operations, using multiple external sources. In this paper, we highlight the importance of boards of directors and absorptive capacity for gaining access to varied and current knowledge that enriches CE. We suggest that boards and absorptive capacity complement each other in fueling CE activities. Further, boards can sometimes substitute for poor absorptive capacity and vice versa, influencing the intensity of CE activities. Managing these complementarities (or substitutions) is crucial for sustaining CE initiatives and creating value from them. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 260
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   ACCOUNTABILITY AND HELPING - WHEN NEEDS EXCEED RESOURCES [J].
ADELBERG, S ;
BATSON, CD .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 36 (04) :343-350
[2]  
[Anonymous], CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
[3]  
Banks E., 2004, Corporate Governance: Financial Responsibility, Controls and Ethics
[4]   The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 [J].
Barney, J ;
Wright, M ;
Ketchen, DJ .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (06) :625-641
[5]  
Barringer B.R., 1999, Strategic Management Journal, V20, P421, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097
[6]   Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs [J].
Branzei, O ;
Vertinsky, I .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2006, 21 (01) :75-105
[7]   A MODEL OF THE INTERACTION OF STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR, CORPORATE CONTEXT, AND THE CONCEPT OF STRATEGY [J].
BURGELMAN, RA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1983, 8 (01) :61-70
[8]  
Castanias RP, 2001, J MANAGE, V27, P661, DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00117-9
[9]   When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power [J].
Coff, RW .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (02) :119-133
[10]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152