Critical rationalism and engineering: ontology

被引:9
作者
Staples, Mark [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NICTA, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Engineering; Ontology; Critical rationalism; KNOWLEDGE; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11229-014-0396-3
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Engineering is often said to be 'scientific', but the nature of knowledge in engineering is different to science. Engineering has a different ontological basis-its theories address different entities and are judged by different criteria. In this paper I use Popper's three worlds ontological framework to propose a model of engineering theories, and provide an abstract logical view of engineering theories analogous to the deductive-nomological view of scientific theories. These models frame three key elements from definitions of engineering: requirements, designs of artefacts, and theories for reasoning about how artefacts will meet requirements. In a subsequent paper I use this ontological basis to explore methodological issues in the growth of engineering knowledge from the perspective of critical rationalism.
引用
收藏
页码:2255 / 2279
页数:25
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1977, SELF ITS BRAIN ARGUM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1966, Technol Cult, DOI DOI 10.2307/3101932
[3]  
[Anonymous], MECH PROOF COMPUTING
[4]  
Boon M., 2011, Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, V15, P49
[5]   The computer scientist as toolsmith .2. [J].
Brooks, F .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1996, 39 (03) :61-68
[6]  
Campbell D.T., 1974, Philosophy of Karl Popper, V1
[7]  
Cantwell J., 2007, TECHNE RES PHILOS TE, V11, P55
[8]  
Cartwright N., 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie
[9]  
Chakrabarty M., 2012, PHIL SCI ASS 23 BIEN
[10]  
Constant E.W., 1984, The Nature of Technological Knowledge, P27