Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Cultural Intelligence Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Ilhan, Mustafa [1 ]
Cetin, Bayram [2 ]
机构
[1] Dicle Univ, Ziya Gokalp Egitim Fak, Diyarbakir, Turkey
[2] Gaziantep Univ, Gaziantep Egitim Fak, Gaziantep, Turkey
来源
HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION | 2014年 / 29卷 / 02期
关键词
cultural intelligence; cultural intelligence scale; validity; reliability; REDEFINING INTERACTIONS; 4-FACTOR MODEL; CONSTRUCTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present study is to adapt Cultural Intelligence Scale (CIS), which is developed by Ang et al. (2007) to Turkish, and to assess its psychometrics properties. Research was conducted on 5 different study groups, who consisted of 1104 students at Dicle University Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty during 2012 Spring Semester. In Turkish adaptation process of CIS, its language equivalence was assessed and strong positive and significant correlations were obtained between Turkish and English versions. Explanatory and Confirmatory factor analysis showed four factors for Turkish version of CIS similar to its original version. Concurrent validity results showed that correlation between Turkish version of CIS and Intercultural Sensitivity Scale was .61 and correlation between Turkish version of CIS and Tromso Social Intelligence Scale was .44. Reliability analyses showed .85 internal consistency coefficient and .81 test-retest reliability. Item analyses showed corrected item-total correlations were between .33 and .64. Based on these results, it can be concluded that Turkish version of CIS is a valid and reliable measurement in assessing university students' cultural intelligence.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 114
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Motivational Persistence Scale
    Saricam, Hakan
    Akin, Ahmet
    Akin, Umran
    Ilbay, Azmi Bayram
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2014, 3 (01): : 60 - 69
  • [32] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Loneliness at Work Scale
    Dogan, Tayfun
    Cetin, Bayram
    Sungur, Mehmet Z.
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 10 (04): : 271 - 277
  • [33] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Burden Assessment Scale
    Aydemir, Omer
    Dikici, Didem Suculluoglu
    Akdeniz, Fatma
    Kalayci, Fatma
    NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2012, 49 (04): : 276 - 280
  • [34] The Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Social Curiosity Scale
    Karakullukcu, Serdar
    Karakullukcu, Erdinc
    Bal, Betul
    Kazak, Aysun
    Karakullukcu, Ayse
    ISTANBUL UNIVERSITESI SOSYOLOJI DERGISI-ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2022, 42 (03): : 133 - 151
  • [35] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Recovery Assessment Scale
    Guler, Cansu
    Gurkan, Ayca
    DUSUNEN ADAM-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 32 (04): : 309 - 319
  • [36] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A TURKISH VERSION OF THE PASSIONATE LOVE SCALE
    Yildirim, Filiz
    Hablemitoglu, Sengul
    Barnett, Rosemary V.
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2014, 42 (04): : 673 - 684
  • [37] Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale
    Onal, Ozgur
    Eroglu, Hande Nur
    Evcil, Fatma Yagmur
    Kisioglu, Ahmet Nesimi
    Uskun, Ersin
    TURKISH ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS, 2021, 56 (03): : 230 - 235
  • [38] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Postoperative Fatigue Scale
    Cetinkaya, Funda
    Aslan, Kevser Sevgi Unal
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (03): : 652 - 657
  • [39] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fear of Cancer Scale
    Ozturk, Mehmet Halil
    Kuday, Ahmet Dogan
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2025,
  • [40] The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Smartphone Impact Scale
    Birinci, Tansu
    Van Der Veer, Pinar
    Mutlu, Caner
    Mutlu, Ebru Kaya
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2023, 46 (01) : 84 - 91