Fuzzy based failure modes and effect analysis for yacht system design

被引:62
作者
Helvacioglu, Sebnem [1 ]
Ozen, Emre [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Yacht fire system; FMEA; RPN; FMAGDM; TOPSIS; RISK-EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.015
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
This research is aimed at utilising failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) which is a reliability analysis method applicable to yacht system design. The failure modes which can be acquired from a group of experts can be linguistic terms including vagueness. FMEA aims to rank the failure modes from high to less risky in order to take the corrective actions by using risk priority numbers (RPNs). RPN method cannot emphasise the nature of the problem, which is multi-attributable and has a group of experts' opinions. Furthermore, attributes are subjective and have different importance levels. In this paper, a framework is proposed to overcome the shortcomings of the traditional method through the Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making (FMAGDM), which helps to solve the selection of risky failure modes. Fuzzy sets (FSs) are utilised for expressing fuzziness of crisp/linguistic knowledge coupled with the well-known TOPSIS methodology for decision making. The current work demonstrates that there is not much application of FMEA and FMAGDM in the area of yacht system design. The comparison of ranking results for two methods shows that selection of the risky failure modes along with FMAGDM are more reliable from an engineering point of view. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 141
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] A subjective approach for ballast water risk estimation
    Pam, E. D.
    Li, K. X.
    Wall, A.
    Yang, Z.
    Wang, J.
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2013, 61 : 66 - 76
  • [22] Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning
    Pillay, A
    Wang, J
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2003, 79 (01) : 69 - 85
  • [23] Pillay A., 2003, ELSEVIER OCEAN ENG B, V7
  • [24] Raheja D., 2012, Design for Reliability, P1
  • [25] Rao RV, 2007, SPRINGER SER ADV MAN, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84628-819-7
  • [26] Smith D., 2005, Reliability, maintainability and risk: practical methods for engineers
  • [27] Stamatis D.H., 1995, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis FMEA from Theory to Execution ASQC
  • [28] Vinnem JF, 2007, SPRINGER SER RELIAB, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84628-717-6
  • [29] Wall M., 2002, 2001073 OFFSH TECHN
  • [30] Wang J.Trbojevic., 2007, DESIGN SAFETY MARINE