TTIP and Intra-European Trade: Boon or Bane?

被引:3
作者
Aichele, Rahel [2 ,4 ]
Felbermayr, Gabriel J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Heiland, Inga [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munich, Ifo Inst, Leibniz Inst Econ Res, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
[2] CESifo, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Nottingham, GEP, Sir Clive Granger Bldg,Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Univ Munich, Ifo Inst, Leibniz Inst Econ Res, Ctr Int Econ, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Munich, Ifo Inst, Leibniz Inst Econ Res, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
来源
JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK | 2016年 / 236卷 / 06期
关键词
TTIP; single market; European integration;
D O I
10.1515/jbnst-2015-1040
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The European Union is the world's deepest free trade zone. Amongst its members, it has abolished tariffs and lowered non-tariff barriers. This has led to trade creation within Europe and to trade diversion between EU countries and outsiders. Deep trade integration and the resulting mutual dependence has, in the eyes of many, facilitated political integration. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) will undo some of these effects by means of preference erosion, so that cross-country trade links within Europe may lose relative prominence. However, the presence of a rich fabric of regional value chains in Europe and substantial income effects could counter this development. We provide insights on the empirical importance of these effects based on a New Quantitative Trade Model. We show that TTIP could indeed lower trade integration in Europe since predicted income effects turn out not to be large enough to overcome the effects of preference erosion. However, there is substantial heterogeneity across sectors and countries. One way to minimize preference erosion would be to promote projects and programs to further deepen the EU's single market.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 664
页数:26
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
AICHELE R, 2014, 5150 CESIFO
[2]  
Aichele R, 2016, 219 IFO
[3]  
Aichele Rahel, 2016, 6026 CESIFO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications
[5]  
[Anonymous], 10692 CEPR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1403 GLOB DEV ENV I
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Global Europe: Competing in the World
[8]   New Trade Models, Same Old Gains? [J].
Arkolakis, Costas ;
Costinot, Arnaud ;
Rodriguez-Clare, Andres .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :94-130
[9]  
Bauer Matthias, 2015, 032015 ECIPE
[10]   Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA [J].
Caliendo, Lorenzo ;
Parro, Fernando .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2015, 82 (01) :1-44