Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology

被引:3
作者
Puntambekar, Shailesh P. [1 ]
Kathya, Nallapothula [1 ]
Mallireddy, Chaitanya [1 ]
Puntambekar, Seema S. [1 ]
Agarwal, Geetanjali [1 ]
Joshi, Saurabh [1 ]
Kenawadekar, Rahul [1 ]
Lawande, Akhil [1 ]
机构
[1] Galaxy Care Laparoscopy Inst, Dept Minimal Access Surg, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Hysterectomy; gynecological; laparoscopy; Robot; ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; CERVICAL-CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.4103/0972-9941.129957
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims: To study the role of robotics in various gynaecological cases, benign and malignant. Materials and Methods: A total number of 80 cases have been analyzed. Operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications, conversion rates have been retrospectively studied in all cases. Nodal yield, vaginal margin and paracervical clearance have been studied in all malignant cases. This investigation was conducted at a single minimal access surgery institute. Results: Of total 80 cases, 29 were benign and 51 were malignant cases. In benign cases, total robotic hysterectomies were 24, 2 cases of tubotuboplasty, 1 case of endometriotic cyst excision, 1 case of metroplasty and 1 case of rectovaginal fistula. In 51 cases, 37 of radical hysterectomy, 9 exenterations and 6 were parametrectomy. In benign cases, mean operative time was 80 min, estimated blood loss was 20 ml, mean hospital stay was for 1 day, no major complications and no conversions. In malignant cases, mean operative time was 122 min, estimated blood loss was 50-100ml, 2 cases of ureteric fistulas and no conversions, nodal yield was 30, vaginal margin was 2.5-3.8 cm and para cervical clearance was 3-3.5 cm. Conclusions: Ours is the largest series of robotic surgery in gynecological procedures in India. Benign and malignant cases were addressed robotically showing the feasibility.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 83
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Ridgway, Mildred ;
Skinner, Elizabeth N. ;
Fowler, Wesley C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) :357.e1-357.e7
[2]  
Eltabbakh G H, 2008, Minerva Ginecol, V60, P323
[3]   Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy [J].
Giep B.N. ;
Giep H.N. ;
Hubert H.B. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2010, 4 (3) :167-175
[4]   Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: A pilot study [J].
Kim, Young Tae ;
Kim, Sang Wun ;
Hyung, Woo Jin ;
Lee, Soo Jin ;
Nam, Eun Ji ;
Lee, Woo Jung .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 108 (02) :312-316
[5]   A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer [J].
Lowe, M. Patrick ;
Chamberlain, Donald H. ;
Kamelle, Scott A. ;
Johnson, Peter R. ;
Tillmanns, Todd D. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 113 (02) :191-194
[6]   Robotic Adnexectomy Compared With Laparoscopy for Adnexal Mass [J].
Magrina, Javier F. ;
Espada, Mercedes ;
Munoz, Raquel ;
Noble, Brie N. ;
Kho, Rosanne M. C. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (03) :581-584
[7]   Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery [J].
Mirnezami, A. H. ;
Mirnezami, R. ;
Venkatasubramaniam, A. K. ;
Chandrakumaran, K. ;
Cecil, T. D. ;
Moran, B. J. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (11) :1084-1093
[8]  
Nezhat FR, 2008, JSLS-J SOC LAPAROEND, V12, P227
[9]   A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: Surgical outcomes in a community practice [J].
Payne, Thomas N. ;
Dauterive, Francis R. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (03) :286-291
[10]  
Puntambekar S P, 2009, Int J Biomed Sci, V5, P17