The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of denosumab in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: a systematic review

被引:40
作者
Sohn, Winnie [1 ]
Simiens, Mary Ann [1 ]
Jaeger, Kelly [1 ]
Hutton, Shauna [1 ]
Jang, Graham [1 ]
机构
[1] Amgen Inc, Dept Pharmacokinet & Drug Metab, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
advanced cancer patients; bone metastases; denosumab; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; MULTIPLE-MYELOMA; BREAST-CANCER; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES; CLINICAL-FEATURES; PHASE-II; RESORPTION; DISEASE; BISPHOSPHONATES; OSTEOPROTEGERIN; LIGAND;
D O I
10.1111/bcp.12355
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
AIM The objective of this systematic review was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of denosumab (XGEVA (R)), a fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody which binds to receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), for the treatment of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases. METHODS A total of 708 patients (116 healthy patients and 592 patients with solid tumours or multiple myeloma and bone metastases) included in seven clinical studies were evaluated for denosumab pharmacokinetics. Denosumab was administered as a single subcutaneous (s.c.) dose or multiple s.c. doses, ranging from 0.1 to 3.0 mg kg(-1) or 30 mg to 180 mg fixed dosing, every 1 or 3 months for up to 45 months. RESULTS Consistent with the results in healthy adults, single s.c. doses of denosumab demonstrated dose-dependent, non-linear pharmacokinetics in advanced cancer patients with bone metastases across a wide dose range (0.1-3.0 mg kg(-1)). Reductions in levels of the bone turnover marker, uNTx/Cr, were observed within 1 day. The duration of reductions generally increased with dose and dosing frequency. In patients with solid tumours and bone metastases, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic comparisons across tumour types and concomitant cancer therapies (chemotherapies and/or hormone therapies) suggest that neither tumour type nor type of concomitant therapy markedly affects denosumab pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. CONCLUSIONS Denosumab displayed non-linear pharmacokinetics at doses below 60 mg but at higher doses, denosumab exposure increased approximately dose-proportionally in advanced cancer patients with bone metastases. Following a 120 mg, every 4 weeks dosing schedule, similar denosumab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were observed across tumour types and were independent of concomitant cancer therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 487
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Denosumab in the Prevention of Skeletal-Related Events in Patients with Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors Profile Report
    Scott, Lesley J.
    Muir, Victoria J.
    BIODRUGS, 2011, 25 (06) : 397 - 400
  • [22] Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid
    von Moos, Roger
    Body, Jean-Jacques
    Egerdie, Blair
    Stopeck, Alison
    Brown, Janet E.
    Damyanov, Danail
    Fallowfield, Lesley J.
    Marx, Gavin
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    Patrick, Donald L.
    Palazzo, Felipe G.
    Qian, Yi
    Braun, Ada
    Chung, Karen
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2013, 21 (12) : 3497 - 3507
  • [23] Denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases in advanced breast cancer
    Casas, Ana
    Llombart, Antonio
    Martin, Miguel
    BREAST, 2013, 22 (05) : 585 - 592
  • [24] Efficacy, Safety, and Population Pharmacokinetics of MW032 Compared With Denosumab for Solid Tumor-Related Bone Metastases
    Zhang, Shaohua
    Yin, Yongmei
    Xiong, Hailin
    Wang, Jingfen
    Liu, Hu
    Lu, Junguo
    Zhang, Qingyuan
    Zhang, Longzhen
    Zhong, Jincai
    Nie, Jianyun
    Lei, Kaijian
    Wang, Hong
    Yang, Shu
    Yao, Herui
    Wu, Huijing
    Yu, Ding
    Ji, Xuening
    Zhang, Hua
    Wu, Fang
    Xie, Weimin
    Li, Wei
    Yao, Weirong
    Zhong, Diansheng
    Sun, Hongmei
    Sun, Tao
    Guo, Zengqing
    Wang, Rui
    Guo, Yanzhen
    Yu, Zhuang
    Li, Dairong
    Jin, Hongyan
    Song, Haifeng
    Chen, Xiaoyuan
    Ma, Wen
    Hu, Zhitian
    Liu, Datao
    Guo, Yinhan
    Tang, Jinhai
    Jiang, Zefei
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10 (04) : 448 - 455
  • [25] Cost analysis of skeletal-related events in Spanish patients with bone metastases from solid tumours
    Duran, I.
    Garzon, C.
    Sanchez, A.
    Garcia-Carbonero, I.
    Perez-Gracia, J. L.
    Segui-Palmer, M. A.
    Wei, R.
    Restovic, G.
    Gasquet, J. A.
    Gutierrez, L.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (03) : 322 - 329
  • [26] Denosumab versus bisphosphonates in patients with advanced cancers-related bone metastasis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Menshawy, Amr
    Mattar, Omar
    Abdulkarim, Ali
    Kasem, Shiref
    Nasreldin, Noha
    Menshawy, Esraa
    Mohammed, Salahuddean
    Abdel-Maboud, Mohamed
    Gadelkarim, Mohamed
    El Ashal, Gehad Gamal
    Elgebaly, Ahmed Saber
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2018, 26 (04) : 1029 - 1038
  • [27] Effects of denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid cancers
    Perez-Lopez, Faustino R.
    CLIMACTERIC, 2014, 17 (05) : 616 - 618
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States
    Stopeck, Alison
    Brufsky, Adam
    Kennedy, Lisa
    Bhatta, Sumi
    Bhowmik, Debajyoti
    Buchanan, Jacqueline
    Despiegel, Nicolas
    Hechmati, Guy
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [29] SEOM guidelines for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumours
    Javier Cassinello Espinosa
    Aránzazu González del Alba Baamonde
    Fernando Rivera Herrero
    Esther Holgado Martín
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2012, 14 : 505 - 511
  • [30] SEOM guidelines for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumours
    Cassinello Espinosa, Javier
    del Alba Baamonde, Aranzazu Gonzalez
    Rivera Herrero, Fernando
    Holgado Martin, Esther
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 (07) : 505 - 511