Return on investment of the ecological infrastructure in a new forest frontier in Brazilian Amazonia

被引:27
作者
Albuquerque de Castro Dias, Teresa Cristina [1 ,2 ]
da Cunha, Alan Cavalcanti [1 ]
Cardoso da Silva, Jose Maria [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Amapa, Grad Program Trop Biodivers, Rodovia Juscelino Kubitschek,Km 02, BR-68903419 Macapa, Amapa, Brazil
[2] Inst Brasileiro Meio Ambiente & Recursos Nat Reno, Rua Conselheiro Mafra 784, BR-88010102 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[3] Univ Miami, Dept Geog, 1300 Campo Sano Ave,POB 248067, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
关键词
Protected areas; Brazil; Amazon; Management costs; Amapa; Ecosystem services; Sustainable development; PROTECTED AREAS; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; COSTS; DEGAZETTEMENT; DEFORESTATION; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.016
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Protected areas anchor the ecological infrastructure that societies need for long-term prosperity and provide benefits to local, national, and global stakeholders. However, these areas continue to go unfunded. In this paper, we have provided the first estimate of the return on investment for nine large protected areas that compose the core of the ecological infrastructure of the State of Amapa, which is located in a new forest frontier in Brazilian Amazonia. These nine protected areas will require US $147.2 million over five years in order to be established and then US $32.7 million in annual recurrent costs. If implemented, these nine protected areas have the potential to contribute at least US $362.4 million per year in benefits (timber, non-timber forest products, nature-based tourism, fisheries, and carbon) to the local economy. The return on investment (ROI) of these protected areas will be 1.6% during the first five years and 10% thereafter; however, ROI could reach 45.8% or more if option and non-use values are also included as benefits. Although the costs of establishing the protected area system in Amapa are higher (US $3.2-3.5 ha(-1) y(-1)) than the costs reported in other tropical forest regions (US $0.20.4 ha(-1) y(-1)), the investments required are within the reach of both state and national governments. Our study shows that if fully implemented, protected areas can become engines for socio-economic upliftment, making the conservation-centered development model a feasible option for most of the world's new forest frontiers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 193
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SHARING STAGE STATE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The Last Frontier Forests: Ecosystems and Economies on the Edge-WRI
[3]   Inclusion of costs in conservation planning depends on limited datasets and hopeful assumptions [J].
Armsworth, Paul R. .
YEAR IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 1322 :61-76
[4]   Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? [J].
Balmford, A ;
Whitten, T .
ORYX, 2003, 37 (02) :238-250
[5]  
Bandeira R., 2012, POTENCIAL EC FLOREST
[6]  
BECKER Bertha K., 2009, Amazonia: geopolitica na virada do III milenio
[7]  
Benedict M., 2006, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
[8]   Downgrading, Downsizing, Degazettement, and Reclassification of Protected Areas in Brazil [J].
Bernard, E. ;
Penna, L. A. O. ;
Araujo, E. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (04) :939-950
[9]   An estimate of the costs of an effective system of protected areas in the Niger Delta - Congo Basin Forest Region [J].
Blom, A .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2004, 13 (14) :2661-2678
[10]   Conservation Planning: A Review of Return on Investment Analysis [J].
Boyd, James ;
Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca ;
Siikamaeki, Juha .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2015, 9 (01) :23-42