Automation and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Individualized High-Quality Tangent Breast Treatment Plans

被引:73
作者
Purdie, Thomas G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dinniwell, Robert E. [1 ,2 ]
Fyles, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
Sharpe, Michael B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Techna Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2014年 / 90卷 / 03期
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PROSTATE-CANCER; UNITED-STATES; IMRT; RADIOTHERAPY; TECHNOLOGY; ADOPTION; STANDARD; PATIENT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.056
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To demonstrate the large-scale clinical implementation and performance of an automated treatment planning methodology for tangential breast intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods and Materials: Automated planning was used to prospectively plan tangential breast IMRT treatment for 1661 patients between June 2009 and November 2012. The automated planning method emulates the manual steps performed by the user during treatment planning, including anatomical segmentation, beam placement, optimization, dose calculation, and plan documentation. The user specifies clinical requirements of the plan to be generated through a user interface embedded in the planning system. The automated method uses heuristic algorithms to define and simplify the technical aspects of the treatment planning process. Results: Automated planning was used in 1661 of 1708 patients receiving tangential breast IMRT during the time interval studied. Therefore, automated planning was applicable in greater than 97% of cases. The time for treatment planning using the automated process is routinely 5 to 6 minutes on standard commercially available planning hardware. We have shown a consistent reduction in plan rejections from plan reviews through the standard quality control process or weekly quality review multidisciplinary breast rounds as we have automated the planning process for tangential breast IMRT. Clinical plan acceptance increased from 97.3% using our previous semiautomated inverse method to 98.9% using the fully automated method. Conclusions: Automation has become the routine standard method for treatment planning of tangential breast IMRT at our institution and is clinically feasible on a large scale. The method has wide clinical applicability and can add tremendous efficiency, standardization, and quality to the current treatment planning process. The use of automated methods can allow centers to more rapidly adopt IMRT and enhance access to the documented improvements in care for breast cancer patients, using technologies that are widely available and already in clinical use. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:688 / 695
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] American Society for Radiation Oncology, 5 THINGS PHYS PAT SH
  • [2] Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning
    Appenzoller, Lindsey M.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    Thorstad, Wade L.
    Mutic, Sasa
    Moore, Kevin L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (12) : 7446 - 7461
  • [3] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF FORWARD-PLANNED INTENSITY MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR EARLY BREAST CANCER: INTERIM RESULTS AT 2 YEARS
    Barnett, Gillian C.
    Wilkinson, Jennifer S.
    Moody, Anne M.
    Wilson, Charles B.
    Twyman, Nicola
    Wishart, Gordon C.
    Burnet, Neil G.
    Coles, Charlotte E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02): : 715 - 723
  • [4] Knowledge-based IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer
    Chanyavanich, Vorakarn
    Das, Shiva K.
    Lee, William R.
    Lo, Joseph Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (05) : 2515 - 2522
  • [5] Randomised trial of standard 2D radiotherapy (RT) versus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients prescribed breast radiotherapy
    Donovan, Ellen
    Bleakley, Natalie
    Denholm, Erica
    Evans, Phil
    Gothard, Lone
    Hanson, Jane
    Peckitt, Clare
    Reise, Stephanie
    Ross, Gill
    Sharp, Grace
    Symonds-Tayler, Richard
    Tait, Diana
    Yarnold, John
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 (03) : 254 - 264
  • [6] A Knowledge-Based Approach to Improving and Homogenizing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning Quality Among Treatment Centers: An Example Application to Prostate Cancer Planning
    Good, David
    Lo, Joseph
    Lee, W. Robert
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Das, Shiva K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (01): : 176 - 181
  • [7] Promises and pitfalls of new technology in radiotherapy
    Guedea, Ferran
    [J]. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 (09) : 631 - 633
  • [8] Should intensity-modulated radiation therapy be the standard of care in the conservatively managed breast cancer patient?
    Haffty, Bruce G.
    Buchholz, Thomas A.
    McCormick, Beryl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (13) : 2072 - 2074
  • [9] IMRT for Breast Cancer-Balancing Outcomes, Patient Selection, and Resource Utilization
    Kachnic, Lisa A.
    Powell, Simon N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (10) : 777 - 779
  • [10] A new metric for assessing IMRT modulation complexity and plan deliverability
    McNiven, Andrea L.
    Sharpe, Michael B.
    Purdie, Thomas G.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (02) : 505 - 515