Augmented patient-specific facial prosthesis production using medical imaging modelling and 3D printing technologies for improved patient outcomes

被引:32
作者
Mohammed, Mazher I. [1 ]
Cadd, Brenton [2 ]
Peart, Greg [2 ]
Gibson, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Engn, Waurn Ponds Campus, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Facial Prosthet, Parkville, Vic, Australia
关键词
Prosthesis; 3D printing; modelling; medical device; patient-specific; EAR MODEL; RECONSTRUCTION; REHABILITATION; MANUFACTURE; DEFORMITY; IMPLANT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/17452759.2018.1446122
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Facial prosthetic offer patients a low risk and high impact treatment option to address underlying facial defects. Such devices are generally handmade, requiring several labour-intensive manufacturing phases and numerous patient consultations to develop the final device. Therefore, production is a time-consuming and costly process with significant inconvenience to the patient and highly dependent on the skills of the prosthetists, making the whole process highly subjective. We investigate the potential of medical imaging, 3D design modelling and high-resolution 3D printing to augment the production of an auricular prosthesis for a patient who was previously using a handmade prosthesis. We reproduce the patient's uncompromised anatomy from CT scan data, before printing a mirrored template to use in the casting process for a silicone prosthesis. This technique realises a superior end prosthesis with a realistic look on the patient while streamlining the current production methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 176
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   An investigation of three-dimensional scanning of human body surfaces and its use in the design and manufacture of prostheses [J].
Bibb, R ;
Freeman, P ;
Brown, R ;
Sugar, A ;
Evans, P ;
Bocca, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2000, 214 (H6) :589-594
[2]   Developing a parametric ear model for auricular reconstruction: A new step towards patient-specific implants [J].
Bos, E. J. ;
Scholten, T. ;
Song, Y. ;
Verlinden, J. C. ;
Wolff, J. ;
Forouzanfar, T. ;
Helder, M. N. ;
van Zuijlen, P. .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (03) :390-395
[3]   CAD/CAM ear model and virtual construction of the mold [J].
Ciocca, Leonardo ;
Mingucci, Roberto ;
Gassino, Gianfranco ;
Scotti, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2007, 98 (05) :339-343
[4]   Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology [J].
Cohen, Adir ;
Laviv, Amir ;
Berman, Phillip ;
Nashef, Rizan ;
Abu-Tair, Jawad .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 108 (05) :661-666
[5]   Evaluation of direct and indirect additive manufacture of maxillofacial prostheses [J].
Eggbeer, Dominic ;
Bibb, Richard ;
Evans, Peter ;
Ji, Lu .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2012, 226 (H9) :718-728
[6]  
Fitzpatrick A P., 2017, KnE Eng, V2, P135, DOI DOI 10.18502/KEG.V2I2.607
[7]   The Human Face as a Dynamic Tool for Social Communication [J].
Jack, Rachael E. ;
Schyns, Philippe G. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (14) :R621-R634
[8]  
Jain S, 2011, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, V11, P265, DOI 10.1007/s13191-011-0094-5
[9]   EVALUATION OF FACIAL PROSTHESES [J].
JANI, RM ;
SCHAAF, NG .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1978, 39 (05) :546-550
[10]  
Jung-Seob L., 2014, BIOFABRICATION, V6