Predicting central line-associated bloodstream infections and mortality using supervised machine learning

被引:50
作者
Parreco, Joshua P. [1 ]
Hidalgo, Antonio E. [1 ]
Badilla, Alejandro D. [2 ]
Ilyas, Omar [3 ]
Rattan, Rishi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Surg, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Surg & Surg Crit Care, 1800 NW 10th Ave,T215 D-40, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Central line-associated bloodstream infection; Severity of illness score; Hospital-acquired infections; Quality improvement; MULTICENTER; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.02.010
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare machine learning techniques for predicting central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Materials and methods: The Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III database was queried for all ICU admissions. The variables included six different severities of illness scores calculated on the first day of ICU admission with their components and comorbidities. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, central line placement, and CLABSI. Predictive models were created for these outcomes using classifiers with different algorithms: logistic regression, gradient boosted trees, and deep learning. Results: There were 57,786 total hospital admissions and the mortality rate was 10.1%. There were 38.4% patients with a central line and the rate of CLABSI was 15%. The classifiers using deep learning performed with the highest AUC for mortality, 0.885 = 0.010 (p 0.01) and central line placement, 0.816 +/- 0.006 (p < 0.01). The classifier using logistic regression for predicting CLABSI performed with an AUC of 0.722 +/- 0.048 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study demonstrates models for identifying patients who will develop CLABSI. Early identification of these patients has implications for quality, cost, and outcome improvements. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 162
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, HAC REDUCTION PROGRA
[2]  
[Anonymous], TOOLS RED CENTR LIN
[3]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011, VIT SIGNS CENTR LIN
[4]   Using Supervised Machine Learning to Classify Real Alerts and Artifact in Online Multisignal Vital Sign Monitoring Data [J].
Chen, Lujie ;
Dubrawski, Artur ;
Wang, Donghan ;
Fiterau, Madalina ;
Guillame-Bert, Mathieu ;
Bose, Eliezer ;
Kaynar, Ata M. ;
Wallace, David J. ;
Guttendorf, Jane ;
Clermont, Gilles ;
Pinsky, Michael R. ;
Hravnak, Marilyn .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (07) :E456-E463
[5]   Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards [J].
Churpek, Matthew M. ;
Yuen, Trevor C. ;
Winslow, Christopher ;
Meltzer, David O. ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Edelson, Dana P. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (02) :368-374
[6]   Machine Learning in Medicine [J].
Deo, Rahul C. .
CIRCULATION, 2015, 132 (20) :1920-1930
[7]  
Dybowski R, PREDICTION OUTCOME C
[8]   Risk Factors for Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis of 50 Years of Research [J].
Franklin, Joseph C. ;
Ribeiro, Jessica D. ;
Fox, Kathryn R. ;
Bentley, Kate H. ;
Kleiman, Evan M. ;
Huang, Xieyining ;
Musacchio, Katherine M. ;
Jaroszewski, Adam C. ;
Chang, Bernard P. ;
Nock, Matthew K. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2017, 143 (02) :187-U121
[9]  
Hastie T., 2016, Springer Series in Statistics
[10]  
Healthcare-associated Infections (HAI), PROGR REP HAI CDC