The 'vicious cycle' of personalised asthma action plan implementation in primary care: a qualitative study of patients and health professionals' views

被引:28
|
作者
Ring, Nicola [1 ]
Booth, Hazel [1 ]
Wilson, Caroline [1 ]
Hoskins, Gaylor [2 ]
Pinnock, Hilary [3 ]
Sheikh, Aziz [3 ]
Jepson, Ruth [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Sch Hlth Sci, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[2] Univ Stirling, Nursing Midwifery & Allied Hlth Profess Res Unit, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst Populat Hlth Sci & Informat, Asthma UK Ctr Appl Res, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Scottish Collaborat Publ Hlth Res & Policy, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Barriers; Implementation; Personalised asthma action plans; Primary care; Qualitative; Self-management plans; SELF-MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-015-0352-4
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Personal asthma action plans (PAAPs) have been guideline recommended for years, but consistently under-issued by health professionals and under-utilised by patients. Previous studies have investigated sub-optimal PAAP implementation but more insight is needed into barriers to their use from the perspective of professionals, patients and primary care teams. Methods: A maximum variation sample of professional and patient participants were recruited from five demographically diverse general practices and another group of primary care professionals in one Scottish region. Interviews were digitally recorded and data thematically analysed using NVivo. Results: Twenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted (11 adults with asthma, seven general practitioners, ten practice nurses, one hospital respiratory nurse). Three over-arching themes emerged: 1) patients generally do not value PAAPs, 2) professionals do not fully value PAAPs and, 3) multiple barriers reduce the value of PAAPs in primary care. Six patients had a PAAP but these were outdated, not reflecting their needs and not used. Patients reported not wanting or needing PAAPs, yet identified circumstances when these could be useful. Fifteen professionals had selectively issued PAAPs with eight having reviewed one. Many professionals did not value PAAPs as they did not see patients using these and lacked awareness of times when patients could have benefited from one. Multi-level compounding barriers emerged. Individual barriers included poor patient awareness and professionals not reinforcing PAAP use. Organisational barriers included professionals having difficulty accessing PAAP templates and fragmented processes including patients not being asked to bring PAAPs to their asthma appointments. Conclusions: Primary care PAAP implementation is in a vicious cycle. Professionals infrequently review/update PAAPs with patients; patients with out-dated PAAPs do not value or use these; professionals observing patients' lack of interest in PAAPs do not discuss these. Patients observing this do not refer to their plans and perceive them to be of little value in asthma self-management. Twenty-five years after PAAPs were first recommended, primary care practices are still not ready to support their implementation. Breaking this vicious cycle to create a healthcare context more conducive to PAAP implementation requires a whole systems approach with multi-faceted interventions addressing patient, professional and organisational barriers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Primary health care professionals' views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in practice
    Legare, France
    O'Connor, Annette M.
    Graham, Ian D.
    Saucier, Danielle
    Cote, Luc
    Blais, Johanne
    Cauchon, Michel
    Pare, Line
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 63 (03) : 380 - 390
  • [22] Primary care physicians' views of standardised care pathways in cancer care: A Swedish qualitative study on implementation experiences
    Wells, Michael B.
    Delilovic, Sara
    Gunnarsson, Malin
    Dervish, Jessica
    von Knorring, Mia
    Hasson, Henna
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2021, 30 (04)
  • [23] Patients, caregivers and health-care professionals' experience with an interdisciplinary intervention for people with multimorbidity in primary care: A qualitative study
    Ngangue, Patrice Alain
    Forgues, Catherine
    Nguyen, Tu
    Sasseville, Maxime
    Gallagher, Frances
    Loignon, Christine
    Stewart, Moira
    Belle Brown, Judith
    Chouinard, Maud-Christine
    Fortin, Martin
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2020, 23 (02) : 318 - 327
  • [24] Is it time to abandon care planning in mental health services? A qualitative study exploring the views of professionals, service users and carers
    Brooks, Helen L.
    Lovell, Karina
    Bee, Penny
    Sanders, Caroline
    Rogers, Anne
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (03) : 597 - 605
  • [25] 'Trying to put a square peg into a round hole': A qualitative study of healthcare professionals' views of integrating complementary medicine into primary care for musculoskeletal and mental health comorbidity
    Sharp D.
    Lorenc A.
    Feder G.
    Little P.
    Hollinghurst S.
    Mercer S.
    MacPherson H.
    BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 18 (1):
  • [26] Barriers and motivators to use eHealth in primary care asthma and COPD patients according to health care professionals
    Metting, Esther, I
    Dobelaar, Claudine
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56
  • [27] Healthcare workers' views on decentralized primary health care management in Lesotho: a qualitative study
    Birru, Ermyas
    Ndayizigiye, Melino
    Wanje, George
    Marole, Tholoana
    Smith, Patrick D.
    Koto, Masebeo
    Mcbain, Ryan
    Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
    Mokoena, Mathabang
    Michaelis, Annie
    Curtain, Joel
    Dally, Emily
    Andom, Afom T.
    Mukherjee, Joia
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [28] Implementation of asthma clinical practice guidelines in primary care: A cross-sectional study based on the Knowledge-to-Action Cycle
    Gagne, Myriam E.
    Boulet, Louis-Philippe
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2018, 55 (03) : 310 - 317
  • [29] Trust and Uncertainty in the Implementation of a Pilot Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Program in Primary Care: Qualitative Study of Patient and Health Care Professional Views
    Chew, Evelyn
    Teo, Sok Huang
    Tang, Wern Ee
    Ng, David Wei Liang
    Koh, Gerald Choon Huat
    Teo, Valerie Hui Ying
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2023, 10
  • [30] Informing the Model of Care for an Academic Integrative Health Care Center: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Stakeholder Views
    Ee, Carolyn
    Templeman, Kate
    Grant, Suzanne
    Avard, Nicole
    de Manincor, Michael
    Reath, Jennifer
    Hunter, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2020, 26 (04) : 300 - 315