Item and domain network structures of the Resilience Scale for Adults in 675 university students

被引:29
作者
Briganti, G. [1 ,2 ]
Linkowski, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Route Lennik 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Ecole Super Sante, Dept Pathophysiol, Pl Chateau 3, CH-1014 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Behaviour; community detection algorithms; psychometrics; DEPRESSION; VALIDATION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1017/S2045796019000222
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Aims. The Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) is a questionnaire that measures protective factors of mental health. The aim of this paper is to perform a network analysis of the RSA in a dataset composed of 675 French-speaking Belgian university students, to identify potential targets for intervention to improve protective factors in individuals. Methods. We estimated a network structure for the 33-item questionnaire and for the six domains of resilience: perception of self, planned future, social competence, structured style, family cohesion and social competence. Node predictability (shared variance with surrounding nodes in the network) was used to assess the connectivity of items. An exploratory graph analysis (EGA) was performed to detect communities in the network: the number of communities detected being different than the original number of factors proposed in the scale, we estimated a new network with the resulting structure and verified the validity of the new construct which was proposed. We provide the anonymised dataset and code in external online materials (10.17632/64db36w8kf.2) to ensure complete reproducibility of the results. Results. The network composed of items from the RSA is overall positively connected with strongest connections arising among items from the same domain. The domain network reports several connections, both positive and negative. The EGA reported the existence of four communities that we propose as an additional network structure. Node predictability estimates show that connectedness varies among the items and domains of the RSA. Conclusions. Network analysis is a useful tool to explore resilience and identify targets for clinical intervention. In this study, the four domains acting as components of the additional four-domain network structure may be potential targets to improve an individual's resilience. Further studies may endeavour to replicate our findings in different samples.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] What is resilience? An Integrative Review of the empirical literature
    Aburn, Gemma
    Gott, Merryn
    Hoare, Karen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (05) : 980 - 1000
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, DEV PSYCHOPATHOL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, 151006871V2 ARXIV
  • [4] Complex networks: Structure and dynamics
    Boccaletti, S.
    Latora, V.
    Moreno, Y.
    Chavez, M.
    Hwang, D. -U.
    [J]. PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2006, 424 (4-5): : 175 - 308
  • [5] The Resilience Scale for Adults in Italy: A Validation Study Comparing Clinical Substance Abusers With a Nonclinical Sample
    Bonfiglio, Natale Salvatore
    Renati, Roberta
    Hjemdal, Odin
    Friborg, Oddgeir
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2016, 30 (04) : 509 - 515
  • [6] A network theory of mental disorders
    Borsboom, Denny
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 16 (01) : 5 - 13
  • [7] Network Analysis: An Integrative Approach to the Structure of Psychopathology
    Borsboom, Denny
    Cramer, Angelique O. J.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 9, 2013, 9 : 91 - 121
  • [8] Network analysis of Contingencies of Self-Worth Scale in 680 university students
    Briganti, Giovanni
    Fried, Eiko I.
    Linkowski, Paul
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2019, 272 : 252 - 257
  • [9] Network analysis of empathy items from the interpersonal reactivity index in 1973 young adults
    Briganti, Giovanni
    Kempenaers, Chantal
    Braun, Stephanie
    Fried, Eiko I.
    Linkowski, Paul
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2018, 265 : 87 - 92
  • [10] Intervention studies to foster resilience - A systematic review and proposal for a resilience framework in future intervention studies
    Chmitorz, A.
    Kunzler, A.
    Helmreich, I.
    Tuescher, O.
    Kalisch, R.
    Kubiak, T.
    Wessa, M.
    Lieb, K.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2018, 59 : 78 - 100