The Effects of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement on Native Valve Competency

被引:3
作者
Hironaka, Camille E. [1 ]
Ortoleva, Jamel [2 ]
Zhan, Yong [3 ]
Chen, Frederick Y. [3 ]
Couper, Gregory S. [3 ]
Kapur, Navin K. [4 ]
Kawabori, Masashi [3 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Med Sch, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, South Bldg,6th Floor,800 Washington Ave, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[4] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
left ventricular assist device; heart failure; Impella; aortic insufficiency; mitral regurgitation; AORTIC-INSUFFICIENCY SECONDARY; CORONARY INTERVENTION; IMPELLA; SUPPORT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/MAT.0000000000001529
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Impella left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) are implanted in the left ventricle across the aortic valve. Several cases of secondary aortic insufficiency (AI) or mitral regurgitation (MR) after Impella LVAD use have been reported. Secondary valvulopathies can worsen cardiac function. This single center retrospective study sought to characterize the incidence of secondary AI and MR development after Impella LVAD support. One hundred fifty-two patients who underwent Impella LVAD support between April 2014 and August 2019 were included. Patient demographics, implant indications, duration of support, pre- and post-Impella LVAD echocardiograms, and incidence of increased AI/MR were analyzed. Impella 5.0 and Impella CP were subanalyzed. Following exclusion criteria, AI and MR were analyzed in 93 and 78 patients, respectively. An increase in AI and MR was seen in 17.2% and 12.8% of patients with an event per support days of 0.03 and 0.02, respectively. Clinically significant increases in AI and MR were seen in 3.2% (n = 3), 6.4% (n = 5), respectively. The incidences of increased AI (p = 0.33) and MR (p = 0.45) were similar between Impella 5.0 and Impella CP patients. Worsening AI and MR clinically occur at a low incidence with Impella LVAD use. However, careful follow-up is still warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 546
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Alushi, Brunilda
    Douedari, Andel
    Froehlig, Georg
    Knie, Wulf
    Wurster, Thomas H.
    Leistner, David M.
    Staehli, Barbara-Elisabeth
    Mochmann, Hans-Christian
    Pieske, Burkert
    Landmesser, Ulf
    Krackhardt, Florian
    Skurk, Carsten
    [J]. OPEN HEART, 2019, 6 (01):
  • [2] Acute Mitral Regurgitation After Removal of an Impella Device
    Bhatia, Nirmanmoh
    Richardson, Travis D.
    Coffin, Samuel T.
    Keebler, Mary E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (08) : 1290 - 1291
  • [3] Periprocedural Dynamics of Aortic Regurgitation in Patients Supported With an Impella Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Butala, Brian
    Yu, Raymond
    Schorr, Rebecca
    Gologorsky, Edward
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (03) : 659 - 662
  • [4] Postcardiac Transplant Transcatheter Core Valve Implantation for Aortic Insufficiency Secondary to Impella Device Placement
    Chandola, Rahul
    Cusimano, Robert
    Osten, Mark
    Horlick, Eric
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 93 (06) : E155 - E157
  • [5] A New Paradigm in Mechanical Circulatory Support: 100-Patient Experience
    Chung, Joshua S.
    Emerson, Dominic
    Ramzy, Danny
    Akhmerov, Akbarshakh
    Megna, Dominick
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Kobashigawa, Jon
    Cole, Robert M.
    Moriguchi, Jaime
    Trento, Alfredo
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 109 (05) : 1370 - 1377
  • [6] A Prospective Feasibility Trial Investigating the Use of the Impel la 2.5 System in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The PROTECT I Trial) Initial US Experience
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Mauri, Laura
    Sjauw, Krischan
    Civitello, Andrew
    Kar, Biswajit
    Loyalka, Pranav
    Resnic, Frederic S.
    Teirstein, Paul
    Makkar, Raj
    Palacios, Igor F.
    Collins, Michael
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Benali, Karim
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (02) : 91 - 96
  • [7] Acute Mitral Regurgitation: Unforeseen New Complication of the Impella LP 5.0 Ventricular Assist Device and Review of Literature
    Elhussein, Tarek Ali
    Hutchison, Stuart James
    [J]. HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2014, 23 (03) : E100 - E104
  • [8] Restricted leaflet motion of an aortic bioprosthesis caused by an Impella device resulting in severe aortic regurgitation
    Gaisendrees, Christopher
    Mader, Navid
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2020, 44 (08) : 902 - 903
  • [9] Maintenance of valvular integrity with Impella left heart support: Results from the multicenter PROTECT II randomized study
    Goldstein, James A.
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Douglas, Pamela S.
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Popma, Jeffrey J.
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 92 (04) : 813 - 817
  • [10] The RECOVER I: A multicenter prospective study of Impella 5.0/LD for postcardiotomy circulatory support
    Griffith, Bartley P.
    Anderson, Mark B.
    Samuels, Louis E.
    Pae, Walter E., Jr.
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Frazier, O. Howard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 145 (02) : 548 - 554