Quantifying the operation of sinusoidal mass filters

被引:7
作者
Huntley, Adam P. [1 ]
Reilly, Peter T. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Chem, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY | 2021年 / 56卷 / 02期
关键词
pseudopotential well depth; quadrupole mass filters; sinusoidal operation; spreadsheet stability diagrams; theory;
D O I
10.1002/jms.4703
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Even though sinusoidal quadrupole mass filters have been around for more than 50 years, the relationships defining resolution, resolving power, and transmission from the applied voltages have not been rigorously quantified or discussed. Traditional quadrupole mass filter theory implies that voltages are scanned at constant direct current (DC) to alternating current (AC) voltage ratios with the scanline passing through the origin of the voltage stability diagram. A prominent feature of constant voltage ratio scans is constant baseline theoretical resolving power (m/Delta m) that is the same for all masses. Commercial quadrupole instruments rarely scan at constant resolving power because ion transmission increases with mass. Instead, they scan at constant resolution, meaning that the mass window width is fixed. Constant resolution mass scans are preferred because ion transmission does not change with mass. Commercial mass filter systems create constant resolution scans by linearly changing the DC and AC voltages at a fixed ratio in the presence of an additional negative DC voltage offset. This manuscript systematically quantifies the effects of the DC and AC voltages on resolution, resolving power, pseudopotential well depth, and transmission. To quantify these properties, recently developed spreadsheet tools that calculate the laboratory frame stability of ions from the matrix solutions of Hill's equation were used. Voltage scanning methods and their effects on theoretically determined transmission and sensitivity will be discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   The pseudopotential for quadrupole fields up to q=0.9080 [J].
Berdnikov, Alexander S. ;
Douglas, Donald J. ;
Konenkov, Nikolai V. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2017, 421 :204-223
[2]   Computational Analysis of Quadrupole Mass Filters Employing Nontraditional Waveforms [J].
Brabeck, Gregory F. ;
Reilly, Peter T. A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2016, 27 (06) :1122-1127
[3]  
Dawson P.H., 1995, QUADRUPOLE MASS SPEC, P349
[4]  
Dehmelt H. G., 1968, Adva At Mol Physics Elsevier, V3, P53, DOI [10.1016/S0065-2199(08)60170-0, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2199(08)60170-0]
[5]   LINEAR QUADRUPOLES IN MASS SPECTROMETRY [J].
Douglas, D. J. .
MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS, 2009, 28 (06) :937-960
[6]   Quantifying the operation of sinusoidal mass filters [J].
Huntley, Adam P. ;
Reilly, Peter T. A. .
JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2021, 56 (02)
[7]   New tools for theoretical comparison of rectangular and sine wave operation of ion traps, guides and mass filters [J].
Huntley, Adam P. ;
Reilly, Peter T. A. .
JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2020, 55 (12)
[8]  
March RE, 2005, CHEM ANAL SERIES MON, V165, P1, DOI 10.1002/0471717983
[9]   OPERATION DUN FILTRE DE MASSE QUADRUPOLAIRE EN CONDITION OPTIMUM [J].
MARCHAND, P ;
MARMET, P .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1964, 42 (10) :1914-&
[10]  
Pedder R.E., 2001, 49 ASMS C MASS SPECT