Development and preliminary examination of the predictive validity of the Falls Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT) for use in primary care

被引:105
作者
Nandy, S
Parsons, S
Cryer, C
Underwood, M
Rashbrook, E
Carter, Y
Eldridge, S
Close, J
Skelton, D
Taylor, S
Feder, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Care, London, England
[2] Univ Kent, Ctr Hlth Serv Studies, Canterbury, Kent, England
[3] St George Hosp, Romford Primary Care Grp, Hornchurch, Essex, England
[4] Kings Coll Hosp London, London, England
[5] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, UCL Inst Human Performance, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
关键词
falls; older people; risk assessment;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdh132
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background There is no validated assessment of an older person's risk of falling that is easily applied in primary care. We aimed to develop a two-part tool for use in primary care or the community. Part 1 includes a rapid assessment of the individual's risk of falling for administration by clinical or non-clinical staff. Part 2 (for clinical staff) includes guidance on further assessment, referral and interventions. We assessed the predictive validity of part 1. Methods The tool was developed by an expert panel following the updating of an existing systematic review of community-based prospective studies identifying risk factors for falling and modified in accordance with the feedback from extensive piloting. We assessed predictive validity by a questionnaire survey sent at baseline and 6 months to a random sample of 1000 people aged over 65 in one Primary Care Group area. Results Five items were included in part 1: history of any fall in the previous year, four or more prescribed medications, diagnosis of stroke or Parkinson's disease, reported problems with balance, inability to rise from a chair without using arms. The presence of three or more risk factors had a positive predictive value for a fall in the next 6 months of 0.57 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.43-0.69). Less than three risk factors had a negative predictive value of 0.86 (0.82-0.89), and a specificity of 0.92 (0.88-0.94). Conclusion The tool may be useful for identifying people who would benefit from further assessment of their risk of falling and appropriate intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 143
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NAT SERV FRAM OLD PE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, J AM GERIATR SOC, V49, P664, DOI DOI 10.1046/J.1532-5415.2001.49115.X
[3]   RISK-FACTORS FOR FALLS IN A COMMUNITY-BASED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF PEOPLE 70 YEARS AND OLDER [J].
CAMPBELL, AJ ;
BORRIE, MJ ;
SPEARS, GF .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1989, 44 (04) :M112-M117
[4]   Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial [J].
Close, J ;
Ellis, M ;
Hooper, R ;
Glucksman, E ;
Jackson, S ;
Swift, C .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9147) :93-97
[5]  
CLOSE J, 1999, AGE AGEING, V28, pS1
[6]   FORGETTING FALLS - THE LIMITED ACCURACY OF RECALL OF FALLS IN THE ELDERLY [J].
CUMMINGS, SR ;
NEVITT, MC ;
KIDD, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1988, 36 (07) :613-616
[7]  
*DEP HLTH, 2002, SINGL ASS PROC ASS T
[8]  
*FALLS IMPL PIL GR, 2001, IMPL MULT GUID PREV
[9]   Guidelines for the prevention of falls in people over 65 [J].
Feder, G ;
Cryer, C ;
Donovan, S ;
Carter, Y .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7267) :1007-1011
[10]  
Graafmans WC, 1996, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V143, P1129