Consumer opinions about genetically engineered salmon and information effect on opinions - A qualitative approach

被引:21
作者
Qin, Wei [1 ]
Brown, J. Lynne [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Food Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
consumer attitude; genetic engineering; genetically modified food; knowledge; information; communication;
D O I
10.1177/1075547006294770
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
American consumers remain uninformed about genetically engineered (GE) foods, raising the prospect of their rejection based on outrage rather than risk. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering introduction of GE salmon into the food supply, an animal application likely to raise consumer concerns. As the first step in designing balanced information to help consumers reach informed opinions about GE salmon, we held eleven focus group discussions to compare the effect of limited (six groups) and detailed (five groups) information on the participants' formulated consequences of this GE application. The results suggested that an effective communication piece about a specific GE application should contain basic and specific, including process- and product-related, information to help the recipient formulate consequences, and hence, opinions. It should also incorporate multiple viewpoints on certain and uncertain consequences to increase perceptions of source trustworthiness and help consumers reach informed opinions.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 272
页数:30
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Dimensions of novelty:: a social representation approach to new foods [J].
Bäckström, A ;
Pirttilä-Backman, AM ;
Tuorila, H .
APPETITE, 2003, 40 (03) :299-307
[2]   Consumer attitudes and decision-making with regard to genetically engineered food products - A review of the literature and a presentation of models for future research [J].
Bredahl L. ;
Grunert K.G. ;
Frewer L.J. .
Journal of Consumer Policy, 1998, 21 (3) :251-277
[3]   Consumers' cognitions with regard to genetically modified foods. Results of a qualitative study in four countries [J].
Bredahl, L .
APPETITE, 1999, 33 (03) :343-360
[4]  
Brown M. J., 2001, Tasforests, V13, P1
[5]  
COUNCIL NR, 1989, IMPROVING RISK COMMU
[6]   Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: A psychometric study [J].
FifeSchaw, C ;
Rowe, G .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1996, 16 (04) :487-500
[7]   HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH - PSYCHOMETRIC STUDY OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS TECHNOLOGICAL RISKS AND BENEFITS [J].
FISCHHOFF, B ;
SLOVIC, P ;
LICHTENSTEIN, S ;
READ, S ;
COMBS, B .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1978, 9 (02) :127-152
[8]   RISK PERCEPTION AND COMMUNICATION UNPLUGGED - 20 YEARS OF PROCESS [J].
FISCHHOFF, B .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1995, 15 (02) :137-145
[9]   The influence of initial attitudes on responses to communication about genetic engineering in food production [J].
Frewer L.J. ;
Howard C. ;
Shepherd R. .
Agriculture and Human Values, 1998, 15 (1) :15-30
[10]  
Frewer L. J., 1995, Agriculture and Human Values, V12, P48, DOI 10.1007/BF02218074