Modified version of the PCAT-A10 tool for the evaluation of primary care

被引:4
作者
Rocha, Katia B. [1 ]
Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Berra, Silvina [6 ]
Borrell, Carme [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Pasarin, M. Isabel [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul PUCRS, Programa Posgrad Psicol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Agencia Salut Publ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[3] CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
[4] Inst Invest Biomed IIB St Pau, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Fac Ciencias Med, Ctr Invest & Estudios Cultura & Soc CIECS, Escuela Salud Publ,CONICET, Cordoba, Argentina
来源
ATENCION PRIMARIA | 2021年 / 53卷 / 01期
关键词
Evaluation; Primary Care; Mental health; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; CONSUMER EXPERIENCES; INSTRUMENT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.aprim.2019.10.004
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the measurement characteristics of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the 10-Item Primary Care Assessment Tool for adults (PCAT-A10), shortened from the original Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT), with a new mental health item. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Location: The city of Barcelona. Participants: Of the 3,496 people over 14 years of age from the representative random sample of the Barcelona population, from the 2016-17 Barcelona Health Survey, those who declared they had a family doctor, and had visited a specialist at some time in their lives, and had answered more than 50% of PCAT-A10 items were selected (n = 3,107). Main measurements: Item descriptive analysis, analysis of internal consistency, corrected item - total correlation, of the PCAT-A10 index and the 10 items that make it up. Three scenarios for non-response to treatment were analysed: substitution by 0, by the intermediate value, and excluding people who did not answer any item. Results: The PCAT-A10 index obtained Cronbach alphas of 0.73, 0.79, and 0.85 in the three mentioned scenarios, correlation item total corrected between 0.41 and 0.66, and 20.8% nonresponses to the mental health item. Conclusions: The new version of PCAT-A10 has a high reliability with a higher response in the mental health item compared to the previous version. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ENQUESTA SALUT BARCE
[2]  
Bartoll X., 2018, MANUAL METODOLOGIC L
[3]  
Bartott X, 2018, RESULTATS ENQUESTA S
[4]  
Cassady CE, 2000, PEDIATRICS, V105, P998
[5]   The use of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT): an integrative review and proposed update [J].
D'Avila, Otavio Pereira ;
da Silva Pinto, Luiz Felipe ;
Hauser, Lisiane ;
Goncalves, Marcelo Rodrigues ;
Harzheim, Erno .
CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2017, 22 (03) :855-865
[6]  
Haggerty Jeannie L, 2011, Healthc Policy, V7, P31
[7]  
Harzheim E., 2013, Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Familia e Comunidade, V8, P274, DOI 10.5712/rbmfc8(29)829
[8]  
Harzheim Erno, 2006, Cad. Saúde Pública, V22, P1649, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2006000800013
[9]   Evaluation of primary care: The "Primary Care Assessment Tools - Facility version" for the Spanish health system [J].
Isabel Pasarin, M. ;
Berra, Silvina ;
Gonzalez, Angelina ;
Segura, Andreu ;
Tebe, Cristian ;
Garcia-Altes, Anna ;
Vallverdu, Inma ;
Starfield, Barbara .
GACETA SANITARIA, 2013, 27 (01) :12-18
[10]  
Isabel Pasarin M, 2011, Med Clin (Barc), V137 Suppl 2, P49, DOI 10.1016/S0025-7753(11)70029-X