Does China's carbon emissions trading scheme affect the market power of high-carbon enterprises?

被引:128
作者
Wang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yue-Jun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Business Sch, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Management, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon emissions trading; High-carbon enterprises; Difference-in-differences; Mediating effect; Market power; Market structure; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; VERTICAL INTEGRATION; PATH DEPENDENCE; SHARE; PRICE; COST; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; REDUCTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105906
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The market power represents market competitiveness and investment development opportunities for the enterprise. Carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) increases the internal operation costs of enterprises, and changes the external development environment, so as to affect the market power of high-carbon enterprises. With this in mind, using the panel data of A-share listed high-carbon enterprises in China during 2009-2019, this paper applies the difference-in-differences method and mediating effect model to estimate the impact of China's ETS on the market power of high-carbon enterprises. We can find that: first, the implementation of China's ETS until 2019 has generally led to a 26.99% decline in the market power of high-carbon enterprises. Second, China's ETS has a negative impact on the market power of relevant enterprises mainly through reducing the level of horizontal integration but not vertical integration. Third, it has a significant negative impact on the market power of relevant enterprises in the petrochemical and chemical industries, but not in other six industries concerned. Meanwhile, its negative impact on the market power of state-owned enterprises, and high financing constraints and large-scale enterprises is relatively significant, and the impact on the reduction of market power level of high-carbon enterprises in regions with high carbon prices and high transaction scales is relatively obvious.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Adelman M., 1955, BUSINESS CONCENTRATI, P281
[2]   Increased firm profitability under a nationwide environmental information disclosure program? Evidence from China [J].
Ahmad, Najid ;
Li, Hong-Zhou ;
Tian, Xian-Liang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 230 :1176-1187
[3]   Do Prices Determine Vertical Integration? [J].
Alfaro, Laura ;
Conconi, Paola ;
Fadinger, Harald ;
Newman, Andrew F. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2016, 83 (03) :855-888
[4]  
Amato L., 1995, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, P39
[5]   AN EMPIRICAL ILLUSTRATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO MEASURING THE MARKET POWER AND HIGH PROFITS HYPOTHESIS [J].
ANDERSEN, O ;
RYNNING, MR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1991, 9 (02) :239-249
[6]   Environmental policy and endogenous market structure [J].
Annicchiarico, Barbara ;
Correani, Luca ;
Di Dio, Fabio .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 52 :186-215
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
[8]  
Baibakova TV, 2017, AEBMR ADV ECON, V38, P34
[9]   Trade-offs between environmental regulation and market competition: Airlines, emission trading systems and entry deterrence [J].
Barbot, Cristina ;
Betancor, Ofelia ;
Pilar Socorro, M. ;
Fernanda Viecens, M. .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2014, 33 :65-72
[10]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182