Response to Cutchin's using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment

被引：3

作者：

Breines, EB ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Seton Hall Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Sch Grad Med Educ, S Orange, NJ 07079 USA

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.5014/ajot.58.3.315

中图分类号：

R49 [康复医学];

学科分类号：

100215 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：315 / 316

页数：2

共 8 条

[1] STUDIES OF INDEPENDENCE AND CONFORMITY .1. A MINORITY OF ONE AGAINST A UNANIMOUS MAJORITY
ASCH, SE
[J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1956, 70 (09): : 1 - 70
[2] Breines E., 1995, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY
[3] Breines E., 1990, AUST OCCUP THER J, V37, P45, DOI [10.1111/j.1440-1630.1990.tb01229.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1440-1630.1990.TB01229.X]
[4] Breines E., 1986, ORIGINS ADAPTATIONS
[5] BREINES EB, IN PRESS OCCUPATIONA
[6] Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment
Cutchin, MP
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2004, 58 (03) : 303 - 312
[7] A MODEL OF HUMAN OCCUPATION .1. CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK AND CONTENT
KIELHOFNER, G
BURKE, JP
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1980, 34 (09) : 572 - 581
[8] Mayhew KatherineCamp Anna Camp Edwards., 1936, DEWEY SCH LAB SCH U