Pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviour in children with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:45
|
作者
McQuire, Cheryl [1 ]
Hassiotis, Angela [2 ]
Harrison, Bronwyn [1 ]
Pilling, Stephen [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Psychiatrists, Natl Collaborating Ctr Mental Hlth, London E1 8BB, England
[2] UCL, Div Psychiat, London W1W 7EJ, England
[3] UCL, Ctr Outcomes Res & Effectiveness, London WC1E 7HB, England
关键词
Intellectual disabilities; Challenging behaviour; Pharmacological treatment; Antipsychotics; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Randomised controlled trials; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPECTRUM DISORDER ASD; DOUBLE-BLIND; AUTISTIC DISORDER; RISPERIDONE; PEOPLE; PREVALENCE; ADOLESCENTS; IMPACT; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-015-0688-2
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Psychotropic medications are frequently used to treat challenging behaviour in children with intellectual disabilities, despite a lack of evidence for their efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviour among children with intellectual disabilities. Methods: Electronic databases were searched and supplemented with a hand search of reference lists and trial registries. Randomised controlled trials of pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviour among children with intellectual disabilities were included. Data were analysed using meta-analysis or described narratively if meta-analysis was not possible. For quality assessment, the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were used. Results: Fourteen studies including 912 participants met inclusion criteria. Antipsychotic medication reduced challenging behaviour among children with intellectual disabilities in the short-term (SMD = -1.09, p < 0.001 for risperidone; SMD = -0.64, p < 0.001 for aripiprazole). However, there were significant side-effects including elevated prolactin levels (SMD = 3.22, p < 0.001) and weight gain (SMD = 0.82, p < 0.001). Evidence was inconclusive regarding the effectiveness of anticonvulsants and antioxidants for reducing challenging behaviour. The quality of all evidence was low and there were no long term follow up studies. Conclusions: Antipsychotic medications appear to be effective for reducing challenging behaviour in the short-term among children with intellectual disabilities, but they carry a risk of significant side effects. Findings from this review must be interpreted with caution as studies were typically of low quality and most outcomes were based on a small number of studies. Further long-term, high-quality research is needed to determine the effectiveness and safety of psychotropic medication for reducing challenging behaviour.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviour in children with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheryl McQuire
    Angela Hassiotis
    Bronwyn Harrison
    Stephen Pilling
    BMC Psychiatry, 15
  • [2] Erratum to: Pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviour in children with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheryl McQuire
    Angela Hassiotis
    Bronwyn Harrison
    Stephen Pilling
    BMC Psychiatry, 16
  • [3] Pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviour in children with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis (vol 15, pg 303, 2015)
    McQuire, Cheryl
    Hassiotis, Angela
    Harrison, Bronwyn
    Pilling, Stephen
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 16
  • [4] NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR CHALLENGING BEHAVIORS IN ADULTS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Bruinsma, E.
    deBildt, A.
    van denHoofdakker, B.
    Groenman, A.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (07) : 695 - 695
  • [5] CHALLENGING BEHAVIOURS IN CHILDREN WITH AN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS
    Lye, V.
    Hassiotis, A.
    Timmerman, A.
    Totsika, V.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2023, 67 (10) : 927 - 927
  • [6] Association between epilepsy and challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Deb, Shoumitro
    Akrout Brizard, Basma
    Limbu, Bharati
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2020, 6 (05):
  • [7] Non-pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviours of adults with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analysis
    Bruinsma, E.
    van den Hoofdakker, B. J.
    Groenman, A. P.
    Hoekstra, P. J.
    de Kuijper, G. M.
    Klaver, M.
    de Bildt, A. A.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2020, 64 (08) : 561 - 578
  • [8] A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase physical activity in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities
    McGarty, A. M.
    Downs, S. J.
    Melville, C. A.
    Harris, L.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (04) : 312 - 329
  • [9] Pharmacological Interventions for Hypertension in Children: A Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chaturvedi, Swasti
    Lipszyc, Deborah H.
    Licht, Christoph
    Craig, Jonathan
    Parekh, Rulan
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 28 (08) : 1357 - 1358
  • [10] Conventional exercise interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cugusi, Lucia
    Carta, Mauro Giovanni
    TRANSLATIONAL SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 4 (01) : 6 - 20