Trial of Upadacitinib or Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis

被引:244
作者
Rubbert-Roth, Andrea [1 ]
Enejosa, Jeffrey [2 ]
Pangan, Aileen L. [2 ]
Haraoui, Boulos [3 ]
Rischmueller, Maureen [4 ,5 ]
Khan, Nasser [2 ]
Zhang, Ying [2 ]
Martin, Naomi [2 ]
Xavier, Ricardo M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Clin St Gallen, Div Rheumatol, Rorschacher Str 95, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] AbbVie, N Chicago, IL 60064 USA
[3] CHU Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
COLLEGE-OF-RHEUMATOLOGY; DOUBLE-BLIND; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; SUBCUTANEOUS ABATACEPT; INADEQUATE RESPONSE; CERTOLIZUMAB PEGOL; PHASE IIIB; ADALIMUMAB; MULTICENTER; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa2008250
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundUpadacitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor to treat rheumatoid arthritis. The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib as compared with abatacept, a T-cell costimulation modulator, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are unclear. MethodsIn this 24-week, phase 3, double-blind, controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral upadacitinib (15 mg once daily) or intravenous abatacept, each in combination with stable synthetic DMARDs. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the composite Disease Activity Score for 28 joints based on the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP; range, 0 to 9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity) at week 12, assessed for noninferiority. Key secondary end points at week 12 were the superiority of upadacitinib over abatacept in the change from baseline in the DAS28-CRP and the percentage of patients having clinical remission according to a DAS28-CRP of less than 2.6. ResultsA total of 303 patients received upadacitinib, and 309 patients received abatacept. From baseline DAS28-CRP values of 5.70 in the upadacitinib group and 5.88 in the abatacept group, the mean change at week 12 was -2.52 and -2.00, respectively (difference, -0.52 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.69 to -0.35; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P<0.001 for superiority). The percentage of patients having remission was 30.0% with upadacitinib and 13.3% with abatacept (difference, 16.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 10.4 to 23.2; P<0.001 for superiority). During the treatment period, one death, one nonfatal stroke, and two venous thromboembolic events occurred in the upadacitinib group, and more patients in the upadacitinib group than in the abatacept group had elevated hepatic aminotransferase levels. ConclusionsIn patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic DMARDs, upadacitinib was superior to abatacept in the change from baseline in the DAS28-CRP and the achievement of remission at week 12 but was associated with more serious adverse events. Longer and larger trials are required in order to determine the effect and safety of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. (Funded by AbbVie; SELECT-CHOICE Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT03086343.) In a 24-week trial involving patients with rheumatoid arthritis that was refractory to biologic agents, the JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib was superior to the T-cell costimulation modulator abatacept in reducing disease activity as assessed by a composite measure of joint changes and C-reactive protein level.
引用
收藏
页码:1511 / 1521
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Aletaha D, 2010, ANN RHEUM DIS, V69, P1580, DOI [10.1136/ard.2010.138461, 10.1002/art.27584]
[2]   Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures: American College of Rheumatology Recommendations for Use in Clinical Practice [J].
Anderson, Jaclyn ;
Caplan, Liron ;
Yazdany, Jinoos ;
Robbins, Mark L. ;
Neogi, Tuhina ;
Michaud, Kaleb ;
Saag, Kenneth G. ;
O'Dell, James R. ;
Kazi, Salahuddin .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2012, 64 (05) :640-647
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, COMMON TERMINOLOGY C
[4]   Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial [J].
Burmester, Gerd R. ;
Kremer, Joel M. ;
Van den Bosch, Filip ;
Kivitz, Alan ;
Bessette, Louis ;
Li, Yihan ;
Zhou, Yijie ;
Othman, Ahmed A. ;
Pangan, Aileen L. ;
Camp, Heidi S. .
LANCET, 2018, 391 (10139) :2503-2512
[5]   Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial [J].
Burmester, Gerd R. ;
Lin, Yong ;
Patel, Rahul ;
van Adelsberg, Janet ;
Mangan, Erin K. ;
Graham, Neil M. H. ;
van Hoogstraten, Hubert ;
Bauer, Deborah ;
Ignacio Vargas, Juan ;
Lee, Eun Bong .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 (05) :840-847
[6]   Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy - Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks [J].
Cohen, Stanley B. ;
Emery, Paul ;
Greenwald, Maria W. ;
Dougados, Maxime ;
Furie, Richard A. ;
Genovese, Mark C. ;
Keystone, Edward C. ;
Loveless, James E. ;
Burmester, Gerd-Ruediger ;
Cravets, Matthew W. ;
Hessey, Eva W. ;
Shaw, Timothy ;
Totoritis, Mark C. .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 54 (09) :2793-2806
[7]   Upadacitinib Versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Fleischmann, Roy ;
Pangan, Aileen L. ;
Song, In-Ho ;
Mysler, Eduardo ;
Bessette, Louis ;
Peterfy, Charles ;
Durez, Patrick ;
Ostor, AndrewJ ;
Li, Yihan ;
Zhou, Yijie ;
Othman, Ahmed A. ;
Genovese, Mark C. .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 71 (11) :1788-1800
[8]  
Fransen J, 2005, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V23, pS93
[9]   Tocilizumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (ADACTA): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 4 trial [J].
Gabay, Cem ;
Emery, Paul ;
van Vollenhoven, Ronald ;
Dikranian, Ara ;
Alten, Rieke ;
Pavelka, Karel ;
Klearman, Micki ;
Musselman, David ;
Agarwal, Sunil ;
Green, Jennifer ;
Kavanaugh, Arthur .
LANCET, 2013, 381 (9877) :1541-1550
[10]   Subcutaneous Abatacept Versus Intravenous Abatacept A Phase IIIb Noninferiority Study in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate [J].
Genovese, M. C. ;
Covarrubias, A. ;
Leon, G. ;
Mysler, E. ;
Keiserman, M. ;
Valente, R. ;
Nash, P. ;
Simon-Campos, J. A. ;
Porawska, W. ;
Box, J. ;
Legerton, C., III ;
Nasonov, E. ;
Durez, P. ;
Aranda, R. ;
Pappu, R. ;
Delaet, I. ;
Teng, J. ;
Alten, R. .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (10) :2854-2864