Cancer screening adherence: Does physician-patient communication matter?

被引:48
作者
Fox, Sarah A. [1 ]
Heritage, John [2 ]
Stockdale, Susan E. [3 ]
Asch, Steven M. [1 ]
Duan, Naihua [4 ]
Reise, Steven P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Med, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Sociol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Neuropsychiat, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, New York State Psychiat Inst, Div Biostat, Dept Psychiat & Biostat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Physician/patient communication; Cancer screening; Patient adherence; COLORECTAL-CANCER; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL VISITS; UNITED-STATES; SELF-REPORTS; CARE; WOMEN; DISPARITIES; POPULATION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the separate contributions of patients and physicians to their communication regarding cancer screening. Methods: Research design and subjects: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of survey data collected from 63 community-based primary care physicians and 904 of their female patients in Los Angeles. Results: Patients who perceived their physicians to be enthusiastic (at any level) in their discussions of mammography or fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) were significantly more likely to report a recent test than patients who reported no discussions. Conclusion: Physician discussions of cancer screening are important and effective even when, as in the case of mammography, screening rates are already high, or. as in the case of FOBT. rates have tended to remain low. The value of communication about screening should be taught and promoted to primary care physicians who serve as gatekeepers to screening. Practice implications: Those who train physicians in communication skills should take into account our finding that the communication style of physicians (e.g., enthusiasm for screening) was the only patient or physician variable that both influenced screening adherence and that could be taught. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 184
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Adelman RD, 2000, CLIN GERIATR MED, V16, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0749-0690(05)70004-5
[2]  
[Anonymous], P SURV RES METH SECT
[3]  
Baier M, 2000, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V9, P229
[4]  
Beck Rainer S, 2002, J Am Board Fam Pract, V15, P25
[5]   Training practitioners to communicate effectively in cancer care: it is the relationship that counts [J].
Beckman, HB ;
Frankel, RM .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (01) :85-89
[6]   Communication at the core of effective public health [J].
Bernhardt, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 94 (12) :2051-2053
[7]   Correlates of colorectal cancer testing in Massachusetts men and women [J].
Brawarsky, P ;
Brooks, DR ;
Mucci, LA .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 36 (06) :659-668
[8]  
Bryk Anthony S., 1992, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
[9]  
Caplan LS, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P1182
[10]   Correlates of underutilization of colorectal cancer screening among US adults, age 50 years and older [J].
Cokkinides, VE ;
Chao, A ;
Smith, RA ;
Vernon, SW ;
Thun, MJ .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 36 (01) :85-91