A behavioral perspective on social choice

被引:17
作者
Popova, Anna [1 ]
Regenwetter, Michel [1 ,2 ]
Mattei, Nicholas [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Polit Sci, Champaign, IL USA
[3] NICTA, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Behavioral social choice; Consensus methods; Inference; Model dependence; Voting paradoxes; CONDORCET EFFICIENCY; VOTING PROCEDURES; SCORING RULES; PROBABILITY; PARADOX; MEANINGFULNESS; MANIPULATION; INFERENCE; WINNERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10472-012-9326-6
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We discuss what behavioral social choice can contribute to computational social choice. An important trademark of behavioral social choice is to switch perspective away from a traditional sampling approach in the social choice literature and to ask inference questions: Based on limited, imperfect, and highly incomplete observed data, what inference can we make about social choice outcomes at the level of a population that generated those observed data? A second important consideration in theoretical and behavioral work on social choice is model dependence: How do theoretical predictions and conclusions, as well as behavioral predictions and conclusions, depend on modeling assumptions about the nature of human preferences and/or how these preferences are expressed in ratings, rankings, and ballots of various kinds? Using a small subcollection from the Netflix Prize dataset, we illustrate these notions with real movie ratings from real raters. We highlight the key roles that inference and behavioral modeling play in the analysis of such data, particularly for sparse data like the Netflix ratings. The social and behavioral sciences can provide a supportive role in the effort to develop behaviorally meaningful and robust studies in computational social choice.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 30
页数:26
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], LIBERALISM V POPULIS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1979, Measurement theory with applications to decision making, utility, and the social sciences
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1994, GEOMETRY VOTING
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, P 3 ACM C REC SYST R
  • [5] [Anonymous], FUTURE DISCRETE MATH
  • [6] Arrow K. J., 1963, Social Choice and Individual Values, V2nd
  • [7] Arrow K. J., 2002, Hand- book of Social Choice and Welfare, V1
  • [8] Bennett J., 2007, P KDD CUP WORKSH NEW
  • [9] ON THE RATIONALE OF GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    Black, Duncan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1948, 56 (01) : 23 - 34
  • [10] SOCIAL CHOICE OBSERVED - 5 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS OF THE AMERICAN-PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION
    CHAMBERLIN, JR
    COHEN, JL
    COOMBS, CH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1984, 46 (02) : 479 - 502