Redefining Authentic Research Experiences in Introductory Biology Laboratories and Barriers to Their Implementation

被引:121
作者
Spell, Rachelle M. [1 ]
Guinan, Judith A. [2 ]
Miller, Kristen R. [3 ]
Beck, Christopher W. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Radford Univ, Radford, VA 24142 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
来源
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION | 2014年 / 13卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
INQUIRY; EDUCATION; SCIENCE; BENEFITS; FACULTY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1187/cbe.13-08-0169
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Incorporating authentic research experiences in introductory biology laboratory classes would greatly expand the number of students exposed to the excitement of discovery and the rigor of the scientific process. However, the essential components of an authentic research experience and the barriers to their implementation in laboratory classes are poorly defined. To guide future reform efforts in this area, we conducted a national survey of biology faculty members to determine 1) their definitions of authentic research experiences in laboratory classes, 2) the extent of authentic research experiences currently experienced in their laboratory classes, and 3) the barriers that prevent incorporation of authentic research experiences into these classes. Strikingly, the definitions of authentic research experiences differ among faculty members and tend to emphasize either the scientific process or the discovery of previously unknown data. The low level of authentic research experiences in introductory biology labs suggests that more development and support is needed to increase undergraduate exposure to research experiences. Faculty members did not cite several barriers commonly assumed to impair pedagogical reform; however, their responses suggest that expanded support for development of research experiences in laboratory classes could address the most common barrier.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 110
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2011, VIS CHANG CALL ACT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, REC ACT SUPP UND SCI
[3]  
Apedoe X.S., 2006, J GEOSCIENCE ED, V54, P414, DOI DOI 10.5408/1089-9995-54.3.414
[4]   Using Research to Teach an "Introduction to Biological Thinking'' [J].
Bell, Ellis .
BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2011, 39 (01) :10-16
[5]  
Bencze L, 1999, J RES SCI TEACH, V36, P521, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199905)36:5<521::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-6
[7]  
Benvenuto M, 2002, THOUGHT ACTION, V18, P63
[8]   Transforming Ecological Science at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions through Collaborative Networks [J].
Bowne, David R. ;
Downing, Amy L. ;
Hoopes, Martha F. ;
LoGiudice, Kathleen ;
Thomas, Carolyn L. ;
Anderson, Laurel J. ;
Gartner, Tracy B. ;
Hornbach, Daniel J. ;
Kuers, Karen ;
Machado, Jose-Luis ;
Pohlad, Bob R. ;
Shea, Kathleen L. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2011, 61 (05) :386-392
[9]  
Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University, 1998, REINV UND ED BLUEPR
[10]  
Brewer C. A., 1998, B ECOL SOC AM, V79, P106